You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 96 No. 5, May 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Visually Evoked Response

Binocular Facilitation and Failure When Binocular Vision Is Disturbed

Richard Srebro, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(5):839-844.


Abstract

• The visually evoked response (VER) caused by the horizontal sinusoidal movement of a display consisting of a checkerboard with 15-minute checks of relatively low contrast oscillating at 6.3 Hz is itself sinusoidal with a frequency of 12.6 Hz. When viewed binocularly, the VER is 25% to 30% greater in amplitude than the sum of the amplitudes for monocular viewing. This binocular facilitation may be a VER correlate of normal binocular single vision. It is lost in small-angle esotropes and in normals whose binocular function is disturbed by a vertical prism placed over one eye. Characteristic curves relating VER amplitude and phase angle to frequency of oscillation of the checkerboard display suggest that two "systems" carry information to the visual cortex: a long and a short latency system. In amblyopia, the long latency system may be selectively impaired.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Southwestern Medical School, Dallas.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 18, 1977.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75235 (Dr Srebro).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Disparity Tuning of Binocular Facilitation and Suppression after Normal versus Abnormal Visual Development
Norcia et al.
IOVS 2009;50:1168-1175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual Adaptation to Interocular Brightness Differences Induced by Neutral-Density Filters
MacMillan et al.
IOVS 2007;48:935-942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduced Binocular Beat Visual Evoked Responses and Stereoacuity in Patients with Duane Syndrome
Sloper et al.
IOVS 2001;42:2826-2830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anomalous Retinal Correspondence: Monocular and Binocular Visual Evoked Responses
Campos
Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:299-302.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.