You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 96 No. 2, February 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Indirect Traumatic Rupture of the Globe

Paul M. H. Cherry, FRCS(Ed), FRCS, FRCS(C)

Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96(2):252-256.


Abstract

• Indirect rupture of the globe was found to be a rare injury, more common in males (P <.01), and having a tendency to involve the left eye. Severe chemosis, a hyphema, and hypotony were usually present, but the intraocular pressure was elevated in three eyes. Of the 50 ruptures in this study, 41 were at the equator or anterior to it (P <.01), and 37 were parallel to the equator. Thirty-three of the 41 anterior ruptures were located in the superior half of the eye. The nasalsuperior quadrant between the limbus and spiral of Tillaux, the temporosuperior quadrant between the spiral of Tillaux and 5 mm posterior to the equator, and the temporosuperior quadrant between the limbus and spiral of Tillaux were the three most common areas involved, in decreasing order of frequency. A theory has been described to explain this distribution. The absence of a hyphema (P <.001), the presence of a rupture of 9 mm or less (P <.01), and the use of cryotherapy or diathermy at the wound edge at the time of closure of the rupture (P <.01) were all good prognostic signs. The visual outcome was light perception or worse in 45 of the 50 ruptures, but every effort must be made to preserve the eye rather than to remove it.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 11, 1977.

Read in part before the Annual Clinical Day, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, May 28, 1976.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, 1 Spadina Crescent, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2J5, Canada (Dr Cherry).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vitrectomy for Traumatic Retinal Incarceration
Han et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:640-645.
ABSTRACT  

Prognostic Factors in Corneoscleral Lacerations
Barr
Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:919-924.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.