You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 95 No. 9, September 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Revision of filtration surgery

J. S. Cohen, R. N. Shaffer, J. Hetherington Jr and D. Hoskins

Forty-one procedures were performed to revise malfunctioning filtering blebs in 37 eyes. Thirty-two procedures were undertaken on underfiltering blebs, seven on overfiltering blebs, and two on normally functioning but otherwise unsatisfactory blebs. Revision procedures were successful in 24 of 32 underfiltering blebs, four of seven overfiltering blebs, and one of two normally functioning but unsatisfactory blebs.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk Factors for Glaucoma Filtering Bleb Infections
Soltau et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:338-342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Repair and Histopathologic Features of a Dissecting Glaucoma Filtration Bleb
Grostern et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1566-1566.
FULL TEXT  

Conjunctival Advancement for Late-Onset Filtering Bleb Leaks: Indications and Outcomes
Budenz et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1014-1019.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.