You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 93 No. 1, January 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (67)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Visual Evoked Responses in the Assessment of Field Defects in Glaucoma

John M. Cappin, DO, FRCS; Sarah Nissim, MSc

Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(1):9-18.


Abstract

A technique for producing steady state visual evoked responses (VERs) to pattern reversal stimulation of retinal areas corresponding to discrete field quadrants is described. Patients examined included 10 normal individuals, 11 patients with ocular hypertension, and 21 with glaucomatous field defects (unilateral except in two cases with bilateral defects).

The VERs relating to normal homonymous field quadrants were in phase in all three groups, excluding patients with cataracts. The VERs corresponding to quadrants with small field defects showed a phase shift compared with responses from normal homonymous quadrants in all cases, but were not detectable if the defect filled more than three quarters of the quadrant tested in most cases.

The method offers a means for the objective assessment of visual fields in patients with unilateral optic nerve lesions, provided that central visual acuity is 20/80 or better.



Author Affiliations

From the Electrodiagnostic and Glaucoma Clinics, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 13, 1973.

Reprint requests to Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, EC1 (Dr. Cappin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential.
Graham
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1077-1078.
FULL TEXT  

Conventional Pattern-Reversal VEPs Are Not Equivalent to Summed Multifocal VEPs
Fortune and Hood
IOVS 2003;44:1364-1375.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monitoring Glaucoma Progression with Visual Evoked Potentials of the Blue-Sensitive Pathway
Horn et al.
IOVS 2002;43:1828-1834.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mapping of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects by Multifocal VEPs
Hasegawa and Abe
IOVS 2001;42:3341-3348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Interocular Comparison of the Multifocal VEP: A Possible Technique for Detecting Local Damage to the Optic Nerve
Hood et al.
IOVS 2000;41:1580-1587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual Evoked Potentials to Multiple Temporal Frequencies: Use in the Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathy
Bobak et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:936-940.
ABSTRACT  

Optic Nerve Dysfunction During Gravity Inversion Pattern Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials
Friberg and Sanborn
Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1687-1689.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of the Pattern and Diffuse-Light Visual Evoked Responses in Definite Multiple Sclerosis
Wilson and Keyser
Arch Neurol 1980;37:30-34.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.