 |
 |

Anterior Chamber ParacentesisDiagnostic Value in Postoperative Endophthalmitis
Mathea R. Allansmith, MD;
Carson Skaggs, MD;
Samuel J. Kimura, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1970;84(6):745-748.
Abstract
The results of 115 anterior chamber paracenteses were reviewed. Of these, 14 had been performed for diagnostic purposes in postoperative endophthalmitis. Cultures of aqueous from five of the 14 were positive. Staphylococcus aureus was recovered from three, paracolon bacillus from one, and Bacillus subtilis from one. A polymorphonuclear cell reaction characterized all cases of postoperative endophthalmitis from which bacteria were recovered. Since one third of the eyes with postoperative endophthalmitis in this series contained culturable bacteria, we consider anterior chamber paracentesis a valuable tool in the diagnosis of the etiology of postoperative endophthalmitis.
Author Affiliations
Stanford, Calif; San Francisco
From the Department of Surgery/Ophthalmology, Stanford School of Medicine (Drs. Allansmith and Skaggs), Stanford, Calif, and the Francis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California (Dr. Kimura), San Francisco.
Footnotes
Submitted for publication July 8, 1970.
Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif 94305 (Dr. Allansmith).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Endophthalmitis Complicating Haemophilus influenzae Type B Meningitis
Taylor et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:324-326.
ABSTRACT
Endophthalmitis After Staphylococcal Sepsis
Joseph
Arch Intern Med 1979;139:942-943.
ABSTRACT
Bacillus cereus Endogenous Panophthalmitis
Bouza et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:498-499.
ABSTRACT
Endophthalmitis: Diagnostic Cultures and Visual Results
Forster
Arch Ophthalmol 1974;92:387-392.
ABSTRACT
Experimental Bacterial Endophthalmitis
Tucker and Forster
Arch Ophthalmol 1972;88:647-649.
ABSTRACT
The Uvea
Schlaegel
Arch Ophthalmol 1972;87:713-725.
|