 |
 |

Corneal Infiltrates in Epidemic KeratoconjunctivitisResponse to Double-Blind Corticosteroid Therapy
Peter R. Laibson, MD;
Shashi Dhiri, MD;
Jose Oconer, MD;
Guilherme Ortolan, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1970;84(1):36-40.
Abstract
Twenty patients with epidemic keratoconjunctivitis without typical subepithelial corneal infiltrates early in the course of their disease were treated in a double-blind regimen with either topical administration of corticosteroid or nonsteroid eye drops for four weeks, four times daily. The corneal infiltrates failed to appear while on steroid therapy in a significant number of patients compared to placebo drops. Subepithelial corneal infiltrates were noted to occur on cessation of administration of corticosteroid drops but once again disappeared if steroids were reinstituted up to one year later. This was also shown in a second double-blind study involving 17 patients nine to twelve months after their initial adenoviral type 8 ocular infection.
Author Affiliations
Philadelphia
From the Cornea Service, Wills Eye Hospital and Research Institute, Philadelphia.
Footnotes
Submitted for publication Dec 8, 1969.
Read before the Spring meeting of the Association for Research in Ophthalmology, Sarasota, Fla, April 22, 1969.
Reprint requests to 1601 Spring Garden St, Philadelphia 19130 (Dr. Laibson).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Subepithelial Infiltrates: A Probable Sign of Corneal Transplant Rejection
Krachmer and Alldredge
Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2234-2237.
ABSTRACT
Corneal Histology After Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis
Lund and Stefani
Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2085-2088.
ABSTRACT
Membranous Conjunctivitis Due to Adenovirus Type 7 Infection
Buchta
CLIN PEDIATR 1974;13:232-234.
Adenovirus Type 8 Infections in the United States: IV. Observations on the Pathogenesis of Lesions in Severe Eye Disease
Dawson et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1972;87:258-268.
ABSTRACT
Eyelids, Lacrimal Apparatus, and Conjunctiva
Sexton
Arch Ophthalmol 1971;85:379-396.
|