This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (7)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Comparative Clinical Study

Hermann M. Burian, MD; Nancy E. Luke

Arch Ophthalmol. 1970;84(1):16-20.

Abstract
One hundred consecutive patients with heterotropia were tested for the state of their retinal correspondence with a major amblyoscope, the striated lenses, and the after-image test. Of this group 84 responded with anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) on the major amblyoscope, 50 had some form of ARC with the striated lenses, and 36 had some ARC with the after images. This evidence is interpreted in the classical fashion that the difference in response is due to the fact that the major amblyoscope test more nearly duplicates the conditions of casual seeing than does the after-image test. The data are analyzed also with regard to occurrence of ARC in patients with a deviation of 30 or less and with a deviation of more than 30 the prevalence of suppression, and of unharmonious ARC on the major amblyoscope.

Author Affiliations
Iowa City

From the Strabismus Service, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Oct 31, 1969.

Reprint requests to University Hospitals, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52240 (Dr. Burian).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Strabismus
Reinecke
Arch Ophthalmol 1971;86:326-351.