You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 9, September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Clinical Trial
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eTable
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (56)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Macular Disorders
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


A Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Triamcinolone With Observation to Treat Vision Loss Associated With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

The Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study Report 5

The SCORE Study Research Group*

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(9):1101-1114.

Objective  To compare the efficacy and safety of 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone with observation for eyes with vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to perfused central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Methods  Multicenter, randomized, clinical trial of 271 participants.

Main Outcome Measure  Gain in visual acuity letter score of 15 or more from baseline to month 12.

Results  Seven percent, 27%, and 26% of participants achieved the primary outcome in the observation, 1-mg, and 4-mg groups, respectively. The odds of achieving the primary outcome were 5.0 times greater in the 1-mg group than the observation group (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-14.1; P = .001) and 5.0 times greater in 4-mg group than the observation group (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-14.4; P = .001); there was no difference identified between the 1-mg and 4-mg groups (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-2.1; P = .97). The rates of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract were similar for the observation and 1-mg groups, but higher in the 4-mg group.

Conclusions  Intravitreal triamcinolone is superior to observation for treating vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to CRVO in patients who have characteristics similar to those in the SCORE-CRVO trial. The 1-mg dose has a safety profile superior to that of the 4-mg dose.

Application to Clinical Practice  Intravitreal triamcinolone in a 1-mg dose, following the retreatment criteria applied in the SCORE Study, should be considered for up to 1 year, and possibly 2 years, for patients with characteristics similar to those in the SCORE-CRVO trial.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00105027



Authors/Writing Committee: Michael S. Ip, MD (Chair); Ingrid U. Scott, MD, MPH; Paul C. VanVeldhuisen, PhD; Neal L. Oden, PhD; Barbara A. Blodi, MD; Marian Fisher, PhD; Lawrence J. Singerman, MD; Michael Tolentino, MD; Clement K. Chan, MD; Victor H. Gonzalez, MD.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Laser Photocoagulation and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone for Retinal Vein Occlusions
Emily Y. Chew
JAMA. 2009;302(15):1693-1695.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SCOREing in Retinal Venous Occlusive Disease
Rajendra S. Apte
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(9):1203-1204.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vitreous inflammatory factors and macular oedema
Funatsu et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:302-304.
FULL TEXT  

Endophthalmitis After Intravitreal Injections: Should the Use of Face Masks Be the Standard of Care?
Schimel et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:1607-1609.
FULL TEXT  

Simultaneous intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide and tissue plasminogen activator for central retinal vein occlusion: a pilot study
Yamamoto et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:69-73.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy with intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for naive retinal vein occlusion: 1-year follow-up
Pece et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:56-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laser Photocoagulation and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone for Retinal Vein Occlusions
Chew
JAMA 2009;302:1693-1695.
FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Triamcinolone With Standard Care to Treat Vision Loss Associated With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: The Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study Report 6
The SCORE Study Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1115-1128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SCOREing in Retinal Venous Occlusive Disease
Apte
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1203-1204.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.