You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 8, August 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ocular/ Adnexal Tumors
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Immunohistochemical Studies of Atypical Conjunctival Melanocytic Nevi

Frederick A. Jakobiec, MD, DSc; Kathryn Colby, MD, PhD; Ann M. Bajart, MD; S. John Saragas, MD; Alexandre Moulin, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(8):970-980.

Objective  To evaluate with immunohistochemical methods 5 atypical melanocytic conjunctival lesions.

Methods  This was a retrospective clinicoimmunopathologic study. Routine histochemical staining was performed with multiparametric immunohistochemical analysis with monoclonal antibodies immunoreacted on paraffin sections to identify the following cell antigens: S-100, MART-1, HMB-45, CD45, CD68, CD1a, lysozyme, and Ki-67 (nuclear proliferation protein).

Results  A unique granular cell nevus contained periodic acid–Schiff–positive, diastase-resistant granules and immunoreacted with monoclonal antibodies against S-100 protein and melanocytic-associated antigens MART-1 and HMB-45. Results for CD45, CD1a, CD68, and lysozyme immunostaining of the granular cells were negative. Two epithelioid cell (clonal or inverted) nevi exhibited an identical immunohistochemical profile. Only the balloon cell nevus was MART-1–positive and HMB-45–negative. The granular cell and blue nevi immunoreacted negligibly with Ki-67 (approximately 1% of cells).

Conclusions  S100 and MART-1 reliably immunostained all nevocytic morphologic variants. HMB-45 immunoreactivity of the granular, epithelioid/clonal, and blue nevi did not indicate a more active or proliferative lesion but instead suggested abnormal melanogenesis. Ki-67 was the most valuable immunohistochemical adjunct to morphology for the diagnosis of these benign variant conjunctival nevi, because melanomas display a much higher proliferation index (>10% nuclear positivity among all cells counted) than the current nevi (approximately 1%).


Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, David G. Cogan Laboratory of Ophthalmic Pathology (Dr Jakobiec), and the Cornea Service (Dr Colby), Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston (Dr Bajart); Saragas Eye Center, Somerville, Massachusetts (Dr Saragas); and the Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, Lausanne, Switzerland (Dr Moulin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.