You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of a Continuous Probability Scale to Display Visual Field Damage

Michael Wall, MD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD; Randy H. Kardon, MD, PhD; David P. Crabb, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(6):749-756.

Objective  To derive and display the percentile score (1st-99th percentile) at each perimetric location of a standard automated perimetry test to determine whether this technique will uncover patterns of loss not visible in standard (StatPac) probability maps.

Methods  We computed continuous scale probability plots of data collected from testing 305 visually healthy participants with standard automated perimetry (24-2 Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm). The age-corrected thresholds were sorted by sensitivity at each visual field location. Percentiles were derived in single increments from the 1st to the 99th. We displayed the percentiles as a color scale and then interpreted visual field plots from healthy control subjects and patients with visual system disorders.

Results  Added information was achieved for identifying patterns of visual loss by using the 5th- to 20th-percentile range in conjunction with the lower range below the 5th percentile that is typically used. The extent of contiguous regional defects appeared larger using this method. Healthy control subjects often have threshold results within the 5th- to 20th-percentile range, but these test locations usually appeared randomly spaced rather than in contiguous patterns commonly seen in patients at the border of visual field defects.

Conclusion  Continuous scale probability plots are a potentially useful adjunct for interpretation of perimetry results.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Neurology (Dr Wall) and Ophthalmology (Drs Wall, Johnson, and Kardon), University of Iowa College of Medicine, Veterans Administration Hospital, Iowa City; and Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, England (Dr Crabb).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.