You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cataracts/ Lens
 •Enucleation
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Disruption of the Posterior Chamber–Anterior Hyaloid Membrane Barrier During Phacoemulsification and Aspiration as Revealed by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Shiro Kawasaki, MD; Takashi Suzuki, MD, PhD; Masahiko Yamaguchi, MD; Yoshitaka Tasaka, MD; Atsushi Shiraishi, MD, PhD; Toshihiko Uno, MD, PhD; Masanori Sadamoto, MD; Noriyoshi Minami, MD; Kiyokazu Naganobu, BVSc, PhD; Yuichi Ohashi, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(4):465-470.

Objective  To determine the effect of phacoemulsification and aspiration (PEA) in different surgical settings on the posterior chamber–anterior hyaloid membrane (AHM) barrier.

Methods  Eighty enucleated porcine eyes divided into 8 groups underwent lens extraction at a bottle height of 35 or 95 cm by 1 of the following 4 procedures: standard PEA, standard PEA without hydrodissection (sPEA–), sPEA– including 5 minutes of irrigation of the anterior chamber, and sPEA– including 20 cycles of deflation (5 seconds each cycle) and inflation (10 seconds each cycle) of the anterior chamber. Distribution of gadopentetate dimeglumine (gadolinium–diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid [Gd-DTPA]) in the irrigating fluid was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results  The most common MRI pattern was the posterior chamber type, where Gd-DTPA was localized in the anterior and posterior chambers, followed by AHM detachment, in which Gd-DTPA was evident beneath the posterior lens capsule. The least common was AHM tear, in which Gd-DTPA entered the vitreous cavity through a tear in the AHM. Logistic regression analysis revealed prolonged irrigation (P < .001) and deflation/inflation of the anterior chamber (P < .001) as risk factors for AHM detachment and hydrodissection (P = .04) as a risk factor for AHM tear.

Conclusion  Changes in intraocular pressure can disrupt the posterior chamber–AHM barrier during PEA.

Clinical Relevance  Cataract surgeons should reexamine their surgical settings to avoid unnecessary stress on the eye.


Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology (Drs Kawasaki, Suzuki, Yamaguchi, Tasaka, Uno, and Ohashi), Department of Ophthalmology and Regenerative Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine (Dr Shiraishi); and Department of Otolaryngology, Takanoko Hospital (Dr Sadamoto), Ehime, Japan; Minami Eye Clinic, Kumamoto, Japan (Dr Minami); and Department of Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan (Dr Naganobu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.