You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Corneal Disorders
 •Eye Injuries/ Ocular Trauma
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Sutures and Dendritic Polymer Adhesives for Corneal Laceration Repair in an In Vivo Chicken Model

John P. Berdahl, MD; C. Stark Johnson, MD; Alan D. Proia, MD, PhD; Mark W. Grinstaff, PhD; Terry Kim, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(4):442-447.

Objective  To compare clinical and histologic healing of corneal lacerations repaired by sutures or a new polymeric adhesive.

Methods  A central full-thickness 4.1-mm laceration was made in the right eyes of 60 white leghorn chickens. Half of the wounds were treated with biodendrimer polymer adhesive and half were closed with 3 interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures. Slitlamp examination was performed at 6 hours, daily for 7 days, and weekly for 21 days. Animals were humanely killed at days 1, 3, 7, and 28 for histologic examination to evaluate corneal healing.

Results  Histologic observations on days 1, 3, and 7 showed glued wounds filled with fibrin, then hyperplastic epithelium, and subsequently scar tissue. Scarring was more prominent at day 7 in glued corneas; however, by day 28, sutured corneas exhibited more inflammation and scarring and much more irregular anterior corneal surfaces. Clinically, all glued corneas remained clear while nearly all sutured corneas had some degree of corneal scarring persisting through day 28. The procedure was about 5 times faster with sealant than with sutures.

Conclusion  Corneal lacerations treated with adhesive heal favorably compared with sutures.

Clinical Relevance  Biodendrimer adhesives represent a safe, effective, and technically easier alternative to traditional suture repair of corneal perforations.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Berdahl, Johnson, Proia, and Kim) and Pathology (Dr Proia), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Grinstaff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

In Vitro Sealing of Clear Corneal Cataract Incisions With a Novel Biodendrimer Adhesive
C. Starck Johnson, Michel Wathier, Mark Grinstaff, and Terry Kim
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(4):430-434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

In Vitro Sealing of Clear Corneal Cataract Incisions With a Novel Biodendrimer Adhesive
Johnson et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:430-434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.