You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 3, March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ocular/ Adnexal Tumors
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Vitreoretinal Surgery
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Articles for Residents
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Retinoblastoma Regression Patterns Following Chemoreduction and Adjuvant Therapy in 557 Tumors

Carol L. Shields, MD; Melis Palamar, MD; Pooja Sharma, BS; Aparna Ramasubramanian, MD; Ann Leahey, MD; Anna T. Meadows, MD; Jerry A. Shields, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(3):282-290.

Objective  To evaluate retinoblastoma regression patterns following chemoreduction and adjuvant therapy.

Participants  A total of 557 retinoblastomas.

Methods  A retrospective medical record review following 6 cycles of chemoreduction and tumor consolidation (thermotherapy or cryotherapy). Regression patterns included type 0 (no remnant), type 1 (calcified remnant), type 2 (noncalcified remnant), type 3 (partially calcified remnant), and type 4 (flat scar).

Main Outcome Measures  Regression pattern.

Results  Retinoblastoma regressions were type 0 (n = 10), type 1 (n = 75), type 2 (n = 28), type 3 (n = 127), and type 4 (n = 317). Tumors with an initial thickness of 3 mm or less regressed most often to type 4 (92%), those 3 to 8 mm regressed to type 3 (34%) or type 4 (40%), and those thicker than 8 mm regressed to type 1 (40%) or type 3 (49%). Factors predictive of type 1 regression included larger tumor base and closer foveolar proximity. Factors predictive of type 3 included older age, larger tumor base, macular location, closer foveolar proximity, and lack of consolidation. Factors predictive of type 4 included familial hereditary pattern, smaller tumor base, greater foveolar distance, and tumor consolidation.

Conclusions  Following chemoreduction, most small retinoblastomas result in a flat scar, intermediate tumors in a flat or partially calcified remnant, and large tumors in a more completely calcified remnant.


Author Affiliations: The Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Institute, Thomas Jefferson University (Drs C. L. Shields, Palamar, Ramasubramanian, and J. A. Shields and Ms Sharma); and the Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Drs Leahey and Meadows).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.