You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 3, March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cataracts/ Lens
 •Diabetic Retinopathy
 •Glaucoma
 •Macular Disorders
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Focal/Grid Photocoagulation and Intravitreal Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net)*

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(3):245-251.

Objective  To report 3-year outcomes of patients who participated in a randomized trial evaluating 1-mg and 4-mg doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone compared with focal/grid photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Methods  Eyes with diabetic macular edema and visual acuities of 20/40 to 20/320 were randomly assigned to focal/grid photocoagulation or 1 mg or 4 mg of triamcinolone. At the conclusion of the trial, 3-year follow-up data were available in 306 eyes.

Results  Between 2 years (time of the primary outcome) and 3 years, more eyes improved than worsened in all 3 treatment groups. Change in visual acuity letter score from baseline to 3 years was +5 in the laser group and 0 in each triamcinolone group. The cumulative probability of cataract surgery by 3 years was 31%, 46%, and 83% in the laser and 1-mg and 4-mg triamcinolone groups, respectively. Intraocular pressure increased by more than 10 mm Hg at any visit in 4%, 18%, and 33% of eyes, respectively.

Conclusions  Results in a subset of randomized subjects who completed the 3-year follow-up are consistent with previously published 2-year results and do not indicate a long-term benefit of intravitreal triamcinolone relative to focal/grid photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema similar to those studied in this clinical trial. Most eyes receiving 4 mg of triamcinolone as given in this study are likely to require cataract surgery.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00367133



*Writing Committee: The following members of the DRCR.net take authorship responsibility: lead authors: Roy W. Beck, MD, PhD, and Allison R. Edwards, MS. Additional writing committee members (in alphabetical order): Lloyd P. Aiello, MD; Neil M. Bressler, MD; Frederick Ferris, MD; Adam R. Glassman, MS; M. Elizabeth Hartnett, MD; Michael S. Ip, MD; Judy E. Kim, MD; and Craig Kollman, PhD.
Group Information: A list of the DRCR.net investigators and staff participating in this protocol was published in Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1447-1449.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

SCOREing in Retinal Venous Occlusive Disease
Apte
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1203-1204.
FULL TEXT  

Advances in the Medical Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy
Simo and Hernandez
Diabetes Care 2009;32:1556-1562.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.