You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 2, February 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Trial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Diabetic Retinopathy
 •Macular Disorders
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Articles for Residents
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Observational Study of the Development of Diabetic Macular Edema Following Panretinal (Scatter) Photocoagulation Given in 1 or 4 Sittings

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network*

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(2):132-140.

Objective  To compare the effects of single-sitting vs 4-sitting panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on macular edema in subjects with severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy with relatively good visual acuity and no or mild center-involved macular edema.

Methods  Subjects were treated with 1 sitting or 4 sittings of PRP in a nonrandomized, prospective, multicentered clinical trial.

Main Outcome Measure  Central subfield thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Results  Central subfield thickness was slightly greater in the 1-sitting group (n = 84) than in the 4-sitting group (n = 71) at the 3-day (P = .01) and 4-week visits (P = .003). At the 34-week primary outcome visit, the slight differences had reversed, with the thickness being slightly greater in the 4-sitting group than in the 1-sitting group (P = .06). Visual acuity differences paralleled OCT differences.

Conclusions  Our results suggest that clinically meaningful differences are unlikely in OCT thickness or visual acuity following application of PRP in 1 sitting compared with 4 sittings in subjects in this cohort. More definitive results would require a large randomized trial.

Application to Clinical Practice  These results suggest PRP costs to some patients in terms of travel and lost productivity as well as to eye care providers could be reduced.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00687154.



*Authors/Writing Committee: Lead authors: Alexander J. Brucker, MD; Haijing Qin, MS. Additional writing committee members (alphabetical): Andrew N. Antoszyk, MD; Roy W. Beck, MD, PhD; Neil M. Bressler, MD; David J. Browning, MD; Michael J. Elman, MD; Adam R. Glassman, MS; Jeffrey G. Gross, MD; Craig Kollman, PhD; John A. Wells III, MS.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.