You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 12, December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Clinical Sciences
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prediction of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss by Extrapolation of Linear Trends

Boel Bengtsson, PhD; Vincent Michael Patella, OD; Anders Heijl, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1610-1615.

Objective  To investigate how well short-term progression rates can predict long-term visual field outcomes in patients with glaucoma.

Methods  We calculated visual field rates of progression using linear regression analysis of the Visual Field Index (VFI) for 100 consecutive patients with glaucoma having 10 or more Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm standard field tests. Final VFI was predicted on the basis of linear extrapolation of the slope defined by the initial 5 field test results. Final VFI also was estimated using linear regression of all qualifying examination results for each patient. Primary outcome measures were the absolute difference and the correlation between predicted and estimated final VFI values.

Results  Patient follow-up averaged 8.2 years and 11 field examinations. Median VFI progression rate was –1.1% per year both for the initial 5 test results and also for the complete series. Seventy percent of patients had a predicted final VFI within ±10% of the estimated final VFI, and the 2 VFI calculations had a correlation coefficient of 0.84.

Conclusion  Linear extrapolation based on 5 initial visual field test results was a reliable predictor of future field loss in most patients. Patients in whom linear regression analysis suggests dangerously rapid rates of visual field progression may be candidates for significant alterations in therapy.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Clinical Sciences and Ophthalmology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden (Drs Bengtsson and Heijl); and Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, California (Dr Patella).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Properties of the Statpac Visual Field Index
Artes et al.
IOVS 2011;52:4030-4038.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Method to Measure and Predict Rates of Regional Visual Field Decay in Glaucoma
Caprioli et al.
IOVS 2011;52:4765-4773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.