You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 9, September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Clinical Sciences
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •Medical Ethics
 •Cataracts/ Lens
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patient Attitudes Toward Resident Involvement in Cataract Surgery

Douglas M. Wisner, BS; David A. Quillen, MD; David M. Benderson, MD; Michael J. Green, MD, MS

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(9):1235-1239.

Objective  To assess how patients in an academic ophthalmology practice feel regarding the involvement of residents in their cataract surgery.

Methods  Using an anonymous survey, we asked patients with cataracts about issues related to resident involvement in cataract surgery, including informed consent, how likely they were to agree to resident involvement in their surgery, and the likelihood that they would seek care elsewhere if residents were to be involved in their surgery.

Results  Participants indicated they should be asked in advance if a resident may assist in (83%) or perform (96%) their surgery. The person asking permission should be the attending surgeon. Most participants would agree to resident assistance (83%), and nearly half would agree to resident performance (49%) of their cataract surgery. Participants indicated that they would be upset if the resident assisted in (45%) or performed (74%) their surgery without their expressed permission. Few would seek treatment in a setting without residents if a resident were to assist in (7%) or perform (26%) their cataract surgery.

Conclusions  Most individuals would accept resident involvement in their cataract surgery provided full disclosure was provided by their attending surgeon.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology (Mr Wisner and Drs Quillen and Benderson) and Humanities and Internal Medicine (Dr Green), Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Training Surgeons and the Informed Consent Process: Routine Disclosure of Trainee Participation and Its Effect on Patient Willingness and Consent Rates
Porta et al.
Arch Surg 2012;147:57-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informing Patient Choice and Consent: What Patients Really Want and Need to Know
Morse
Arch Ophthalmol 2010;128:129-130.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.