You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 9, September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Articles for Residents
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predicting Response to Glaucoma Therapy in One Eye Based on Response in the Fellow Eye

The Monocular Trial

Omar Chaudhary, MD; Ron A. Adelman, MD, MPH; M. Bruce Shields, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(9):1216-1220.

Objective  To evaluate whether the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) observed in one eye after starting a glaucoma medication regimen is predictive of the change in IOP due to the same medication in the fellow eye.

Methods  A retrospective medical record review of 22 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 27 glaucoma suspects who underwent monocular drug trials before the drug was added to the second eye. The absolute change in IOP from baseline and the relative change (change in treated eye minus change in fellow eye) in the first eye treated were compared with the second eye after binocular treatment.

Results  The absolute and relative decreases in IOP of the first eye were poorly correlated with those of the second eye in patients with POAG (r< 0.001; P = .97 and r2 = 0.040; P = .38, respectively). However, they were well correlated in glaucoma suspects (r2 = 0.348; P = .001 and r2 = 0.396; P < .001, respectively).

Conclusions  The change in IOP of one eye due to a medication may be predictive of the subsequent response of the fellow eye to the same medication in glaucoma suspects, but not in patients with POAG. Using the fellow eye as a control may confer a more accurate portrayal of the true therapeutic effects of a medicine, although further study is needed to support both of these findings.


Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Studies of Monocular Trials of Glaucoma Medications: Conflicting Results Explained by Varying Methods
Christopher T. Leffler
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(5):707-708.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Studies of Monocular Trials of Glaucoma Medications: Conflicting Results Explained by Varying Methods—Reply
Omar Chaudhary, Ron A. Adelman, and M. Bruce Shields
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(5):708.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Studies of Monocular Trials of Glaucoma Medications: Conflicting Results Explained by Varying Methods
Leffler
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:707-708.
FULL TEXT  

Studies of Monocular Trials of Glaucoma Medications: Conflicting Results Explained by Varying Methods--Reply
Chaudhary et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:708-708.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.