You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 4, April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Glaucoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Total Deviation Probability Plots for Stimulus Size V Perimetry

A Comparison With Size III Stimuli

Michael Wall, MD; Caridad F. Brito, PhD; Kimberly R. Woodward, MS; Carrie K. Doyle, MS; Randy H. Kardon, MD, PhD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(4):473-479.

Objective  To compare empirical probability plots in patients with glaucoma for size V and III perimetry testing.

Methods  We computed empirical probability plot percentile limits after testing 60 age-matched controls tested with both size III (Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm) and size V (full threshold) perimetry twice. Probability plots of 120 patients with glaucoma tested in the same way were computed. We compared the number of abnormal test locations in the 2 stimulus sizes; we then compared these results with those from size III StatPac software (Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, California) using 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results  We found a similar number of abnormal test locations (P ≤ .05) for the size III and size V testing conditions identified by the probability plots (no significant difference); there were significantly fewer abnormal locations using StatPac (size III) than from our size III database. When results were stratified by mean deviation, the mild visual loss group again did not show any significant differences between sizes III and V.

Conclusions  Size V full-threshold testing gives a similar number of abnormal test locations in patients with glaucoma compared with the size III Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm standard test. Size V testing, with its greater dynamic range and lower variability, may be a viable alternative to size III testing in patients with glaucoma.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Neurology (Dr Wall) and Ophthalmology (Drs Wall, Kardon, and Johnson, and Mss Woodward and Doyle), University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Veterans Administration Hospital, Iowa City; Department of Psychology, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston (Dr Brito); and Discoveries in Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon (Dr Johnson).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.