You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Socioeconomics and Health Services
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Diabetic Retinopathy
 •Macular Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Resource Use and Costs Associated With Diabetic Macular Edema in Elderly Persons

Alisa M. Shea, MPH; Lesley H. Curtis, PhD; Bradley G. Hammill, MS; Jonathan W. Kowalski, PharmD, MS; Arliene Ravelo, MPH; Paul P. Lee, MD, JD; Frank A. Sloan, PhD; Kevin A. Schulman, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1748-1754.

Objective  To examine trends in resource use and the effect of incident diabetic macular edema (DME) on 1- and 3-year total direct medical costs in elderly patients.

Methods  We used a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2000 through 2004 to identify patients with incident DME and a control cohort of patients with diabetes mellitus but no history of retinal disease. We summed Medicare reimbursement amounts for all claims and applied generalized linear models to estimate the effect of DME on 1- and 3-year costs. We also examined the use of select imaging techniques and treatments.

Results  After adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline comorbid conditions, DME was associated with 31% higher 1-year costs and 29% higher 3-year costs. There were significant shifts in the use of testing and treatment modalities. From 2000 to 2004, use of intravitreal injection increased from 1% to 13% of patients; use of optical coherence tomography increased from 2.5% to more than 40%. Use of laser photocoagulation decreased over time.

Conclusions  After adjusting for demographic variables and baseline comorbid conditions, new-onset DME was a significant independent predictor of total medical costs after 1 and 3 years. Diagnostic and treatment modalities used for DME have changed significantly.


Author Affiliations: Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute (Ms Shea, Mr Hammill, and Drs Curtis and Schulman), Departments of Medicine (Drs Curtis and Schulman) and Ophthalmology (Dr Lee), Duke University School of Medicine and Center for Health Policy, and Department of Economics (Dr Sloan), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and Global Health Outcomes Research, Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California (Dr Kowalski and Ms Ravelo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.