 |
|
Global Vision Impairment Due to Uncorrected Presbyopia
Brien A. Holden, PhD, DSc;
Timothy R. Fricke, MScOptom;
S. May Ho, PhD;
Reg Wong, MBA;
Gerhard Schlenther, MPH;
Sonja Cronjé, MPhil(Optom);
Anthea Burnett, BSc(Hons);
Eric Papas, PhD;
Kovin S. Naidoo, OD, MPH;
Kevin D. Frick, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1731-1739.
Objectives To evaluate the personal and community burdens of uncorrected presbyopia.
Methods We used multiple population-based surveys to estimate the global presbyopia prevalence, the spectacle coverage rate for presbyopia, and the community perception of vision impairment caused by uncorrected presbyopia. For planning purposes, the data were extrapolated for the future using population projections extracted from the International Data Base of the US Census Bureau.
Results It is estimated that there were 1.04 billion people globally with presbyopia in 2005, 517 million of whom had no spectacles or inadequate spectacles. Of these, 410 million were prevented from performing near tasks in the way they required. Vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia predominantly exists (94%) in the developing world.
Conclusions Uncorrected presbyopia causes widespread, avoidable vision impairment throughout the world. Alleviation of this problem requires a substantial increase in the number of personnel trained to deliver appropriate eye care together with the establishment of sustainable, affordable spectacle delivery systems in developing countries. In addition, given that people with presbyopia are at higher risk for permanently sight-threatening conditions such as glaucoma and diabetic eye disease, primary eye care should include refraction services as well as detection and appropriate referral for these and other such conditions.
Author Affiliations: International Centre for Eyecare Education (Drs Holden, Ho, and Naidoo, Messrs Fricke, Wong, and Schlenther, and Mss Cronjé and Burnett), Institute for Eye Research (Drs Holden and Papas and Mr Wong), Vision Cooperative Research Centre (Drs Holden and Papas), and the School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales (Drs Holden and Papas), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Africa Vision Research Institute, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Dr Naidoo); and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Frick).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Blindness and visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error in sub-Saharan Africa: review of recent population-based studies
Sherwin et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2012;0:bjophthalmol-2011-300426v-bjophthalmol-2011-300426.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study
Marmamula et al.
BMJ Open 2011;1:e000172-e000172.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of distribution of presbyopic correction through primary healthcare centres in Zanzibar, East Africa
Laviers et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:783-787.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Presbyopia and Near-Vision Impairment in Rural Northern China
Lu et al.
IOVS 2011;52:2300-2305.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Neurological and cognitive impairments detected in older people without a diagnosis of neurological or cognitive disease
Woodford and George
Postgrad. Med. J. 2011;87:199-206.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Change in function and spectacle-use 2 months after providing presbyopic spectacles in rural Tanzania
Patel et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:685-689.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Management of refractive errors
Cochrane et al.
BMJ 2010;340:c1711-c1711.
FULL TEXT
|
