You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Epidemiology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other
 •Diabetic Retinopathy
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Articles for Residents
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prolonged Effect of Intensive Therapy on the Risk of Retinopathy Complications in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

10 Years After the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group*

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1707-1715.

Objective  To examine the persistence of the original treatment effects 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in the follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. In the DCCT, intensive therapy aimed at near-normal glycemia reduced the risk of microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with conventional therapy.

Methods  Retinopathy was evaluated by fundus photography in 1211 subjects at EDIC year 10. Further 3-step progression on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale from DCCT closeout was the primary outcome.

Results  After 10 years of EDIC follow-up, there was no significant difference in mean glycated hemoglobin levels (8.07% vs 7.98%) between the original treatment groups. Nevertheless, compared with the former conventional treatment group, the former intensive group had significantly lower incidences from DCCT close of further retinopathy progression and proliferative retinopathy or worse (hazard reductions, 53%-56%; P < .001). The risk (hazard) reductions at 10 years of EDIC were attenuated compared with the 70% to 71% over the first 4 years of EDIC (P < .001). The persistent beneficial effects of former intensive therapy were largely explained by the difference in glycated hemoglobin levels during DCCT.

Conclusion  The persistent difference in diabetic retinopathy between former intensive and conventional therapy ("metabolic memory") continues for at least 10 years but may be waning.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00360815 and NCT00360893.



*Authors/Group Information: A complete listing of the authors and Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Research Group and their affiliations appears in the Author Information section.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Glucose Variability on the Long-Term Risk of Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes
Kilpatrick et al.
Diabetes Care 2009;32:1901-1903.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Metabolic Memory in the Autonomic Neuropathy of Diabetes: Implications for Pathogenesis and Patient Care
Chaturvedi
Circulation 2009;119:2865-2867.
FULL TEXT  

Progress in Diabetes Research--What's Next
Nathan
JAMA 2009;301:1599-1601.
FULL TEXT  

Metabolic Memory in Diabetes Is True Long-term Memory
Frank
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:330-331.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.