 |
 |

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Fusarium, Aspergillus, and Other Filamentous Fungi Isolated From Keratitis
Prajna Lalitha, MD;
Brett L. Shapiro, BA;
Muthiah Srinivasan, MD;
Namperumalsamy Venkatesh Prajna, DNB, FRCOphth;
Nisha R. Acharya, MD;
Annette W. Fothergill, MA;
Jazmin Ruiz, BS;
Jaya D. Chidambaram, MBBS, MRCOphth;
Kathryn J. Maxey, MS;
Kevin C. Hong, BA;
Stephen D. McLeod, MD;
Thomas M. Lietman, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(6):789-793.
Objective To characterize the susceptibility of filamentous fungi isolated from keratitis to amphotericin B, natamycin, caspofungin acetate, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole.
Methods Ninety isolates from fungal keratitis cases at Aravind Eye Hospital in South India were tested using macrobroth dilution for susceptibility to amphotericin B, natamycin, caspofungin, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) median and 90th percentile were determined.
Results The 90 isolates included 41 Aspergillus species, 38 Fusarium species, and 11 others. The triazoles and caspofungin had the lowest MICs against Aspergillus species; voriconazole, amphotericin B, and posaconazole had the lowest MICs against Fusarium species, and none of the Fusarium species were inhibited by itraconazole or caspofungin. Amphotericin B had significantly lower MICs compared with natamycin, but after correcting for the typical prescription dose, natamycin was superior.
Conclusion No single agent was universally most effective, but voriconazole and other triazoles demonstrated the broadest spectrum. Itraconazole and caspofungin were not effective against Fusarium species.
Clinical Relevance Fungal ulcers are commonly treated empirically; drugs are typically selected without regard to susceptibility data. The nonocular infectious disease literature suggests modern fungal susceptibility methods are clinically relevant, but ocular studies are limited. Our results suggest antifungal therapy might be tailored to individual organisms.
Author Affiliations: Aravind Eye Hospital and PG Institute of Ophthalmology, Madurai, India (Drs Lalitha, Srinivasan, and Prajna); School of Medicine (Mr Shapiro and Dr Lietman), F. I. Proctor Foundation (Messrs Shapiro and Hong, Drs Acharya, Chidambaram, McLeod, and Lietman, and Ms Maxey), Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Acharya, McLeod, and Lietman) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Lietman), and Institute for Global Health (Dr Lietman), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio (Mss Fothergill and Ruiz).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Utility of Molecular Sequence Analysis of the ITS rRNA Region for Identification of Fusarium spp. from Ocular Sources
Oechsler et al.
IOVS 2009;50:2230-2236.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Activity of antibiotics against Fusarium and Aspergillus
Day et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009;93:116-119.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
In Vitro Natamycin Susceptibility of Ocular Isolates of Fusarium and Aspergillus Species: Comparison of Commercially Formulated Natamycin Eye Drops to Pharmaceutical-Grade Powder
Lalitha et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:3477-3478.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|