You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 5, May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of Eccentric and Inconsistent Fixation on Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Measures

Robert J. Campbell, MD, MSc, FRCSC; Stuart G. Coupland, PhD; Ralf R. Buhrmann, MD, PhD, FRCSC; Peter J. Kertes, MD, FRCSC

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(5):624-627.

Objective  To assess the relative stabilities of optical coherence tomography (OCT)–based retinal volume and central foveal thickness measurements in the setting of eccentric or inconsistent fixation.

Methods  Ten healthy right eyes underwent multiple macular OCT centered at fixation. To model the effect of eccentric or inconsistent fixation, OCT was repeated with scan centers precisely shifted by 0.50, 1.00, and 1.50 mm in each of 4 directions. At each scan location, retinal volumes within a series of radii of the scan center, as well as central foveal thickness, were calculated. The main outcome measure was the percentage effect of decentered scanning on each OCT-based variable.

Results  Central foveal thickness was the variable most affected in this model of eccentric and inconsistent fixation. This variable demonstrated changes from baseline-centered scans of up to 69.4%. Retinal volumes within a radii of the scan center measuring 1.11 mm or greater were least affected by decentered scanning, demonstrating maximum changes from baseline-centered scans of only 15.7% (P<.001 vs foveal thickness).

Conclusion  Optical coherence tomography–based retinal volume quantification provides a more stable measure than foveal thickness in the setting of eccentric or inconsistent fixation as may occur in the setting of macular pathologic conditions.


Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, Queen's University, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario (Dr Campbell); University of Ottawa Eye Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario (Drs Campbell, Coupland, Buhrmann, and Kertes); and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Kertes).


RELATED ARTICLE

Optimal Optical Coherence Tomography–Based Measures in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Macular Edema: Retinal Volume vs Foveal Thickness
Robert J. Campbell, Stuart G. Coupland, Ralf R. Buhrmann, and Peter J. Kertes
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(5):619-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Optimal Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Measures in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Macular Edema: Retinal Volume vs Foveal Thickness
Campbell et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:619-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.