You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 3, March 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Surgical Technique
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Corneal Disorders
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optimal Size and Location for Corneal Rotational Autografts

A Simplified Mathematical Model

Natalie A. Afshari, MD; Scott M. Duncan, BS; Tasha Y. Tanhehco, BS; Dimitri T. Azar, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:410-413.

Objective  To calculate clinical guidelines for the optimal location and size of a rotational autokeratoplasty.

Methods  The ideal graft size and trephine decentration for a rotational autograft were calculated based on scar location using geometric models. Mathematical variables were set to maximize postoperative visual acuity and for generalization of the geometric model. This model was used in a rotational autokeratoplasty of a patient with a history of a corneal scar and diplopia. An 8-mm autograft was decentered 0.5 mm superiorly and rotated 180° to relocate the scar to the superior aspect of the cornea, out of the patient's vision.

Results  For cases that satisfy the given variables, a graft diameter of 8 mm with a decentration of 0.5 mm balances maximization of scar removal and scar movement superiorly, with minimization of discrepancy in corneal thickness after rotation. For scars that are {alpha}° from horizontal, the graft should be rotated 180 – {alpha}°. By using these calculations, the autograft in this case successfully resolved the diplopia and improved visual acuity.

Conclusions  A rotational autograft can be an effective alternative to standard penetrating keratoplasty for some patients with corneal scars. We establish a mathematical model for most clinical instances of a rotational autograft, in which an 8-mm graft with a decentration of 0.5 mm best satisfies the goals of surgery.


Author Affiliations: Duke University Eye Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Dr Afshari, Mr Duncan, and Ms Tanhehco); and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Azar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Size and Location of Corneal Rotational Autografts
Jost B. Jonas
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(7):992.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Centration of Clear Zone Over the Pupil Is the Best Strategy for Rotational Autografts
David J. Harris, Jr
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(7):992-993.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Size and Location of Corneal Rotational Autografts
Jonas
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:992-992.
FULL TEXT  

Centration of Clear Zone Over the Pupil Is the Best Strategy for Rotational Autografts
Harris
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:992-993.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.