You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 12, December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Biomaterials and Implants
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Inherent Risks Associated With Manufacture of Bioengineered Ocular Surface Tissue

Ivan R. Schwab, MD; Nigel T. Johnson, BAppSc(Med&AppBiotech); Damien G. Harkin, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1734-1740.

Objective  To review the potential health risks associated with bioengineered ocular surface tissue, which serves as a bellwether for other tissues.

Methods  All clinical trials using bioengineered ocular surface tissue published between July 1, 1996, and June 30, 2005, were reviewed with respect to materials used and statements of risk assessment, risk remediation, adverse events, manufacturing standards, and regulatory oversight.

Results  Ninety-five percent of investigational protocols used 1 or more animal-derived products and an overlapping 95% used 1 or more donor human tissues. Consideration of risks reveals a very low probability of potential harm but a significant risk of disability or death if such an event were to occur. Details of ethics approval, patient consent, and donor serologic test results were not consistently provided. No references were made to risk assessment or to codes of manufacturing and clinical practice.

Conclusion  While a degree of risk is associated with bioengineered ocular surface tissue, investigational reports of this new technology have yet to address issues of risk management and regulatory oversight.

Clinical Relevance  Attention to risk and codes of manufacturing and clinical practice will be required for advancement of the technology. We suggest the adoption of international standards to address these issues.


Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis (Dr Schwab); Queensland Eye Institute, South Brisbane (Drs Schwab and Harkin) and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology (Drs Schwab and Harkin and Mr Johnson), Australian Red Cross Blood Service (Dr Harkin and Mr Johnson), and Tissue Therapies Ltd (Dr Harkin and Mr Johnson), Brisbane.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.