You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 11, November 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Articles for Residents
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

24-Hour Control With a Latanoprost-Timolol Fixed Combination vs Timolol Alone

Anastasios G. P. Konstas, MD, PhD; Symeon Lake, MD; Athanasios I. Economou, MD; Kostantinos Kaltsos, MD; Jessica N. Jenkins, BS; William C. Stewart, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1553-1557.

Objective  To evaluate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) control with an evening-dosed latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed combination vs timolol alone in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Methods  After a medicine-free period, qualified patients were randomized to either placebo dosed in the morning with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination dosed in the evening or timolol alone dosed twice daily for 8 weeks. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for 8 weeks. At baseline and at the end of each treatment period, patients underwent IOP measurements.

Results  Both treatments reduced the IOP from untreated baseline at each time point and for the 24-hour curve (P<.001). When treatments were compared, the latanoprost-timolol fixed combination decreased the IOP more than timolol alone at each time point and for the 24-hour curve (2.9 mm Hg), and provided a lower absolute IOP at each time point (P<.001) and for the range (fluctuation) in IOP (P = .003) and for the 24-hour curve. Several adverse effects were observed more often with the latanoprost-timolol fixed combination, including ocular stinging (P = .05), conjunctival hyperemia (P = .02), and ocular itching (P = .04).

Conclusion  The evening-dosed latanoprost-timolol fixed combination may provide better IOP control than timolol alone over 24 hours and may demonstrate a narrower range of IOP fluctuation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.


Author Affiliations: Glaucoma Unit, A University Department of Ophthalmology, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece (Drs Konstas, Lake, Economou, and Kaltsos); Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC, Charleston, SC (Ms Jenkins and Dr Stewart); and Carolina Eye Institute at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (Dr Stewart).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Proposed Mandate for Instructions and Labeling Regarding the Use of Eye Drops
Flach
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1207-1209.
FULL TEXT  

Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma
Konstas et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:481-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.