This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Ophthalmological Disorders, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Sheila K. West, PhD; Beatriz Munoz, MS; Gary S. Rubin, PhD; Karen Bandeen-Roche, PhD; Aimee T. Broman, MSc; Kathleen A. Turano, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1242-1247.

Background  Use of compensatory strategies may be a marker for preclinical disability.

Objective  To determine, among persons who did not report mobility disability, if the reported use of compensatory strategies was a predictor of subsequent disability at 2 years in those who did and did not have visual impairment at baseline.

Methods  Within a population-based sample of 2520 persons aged 65 to 84 years, those who reported no difficulty walking or stair-climbing at baseline (not disabled) were studied. Visual impairment was defined as a visual acuity worse than 20/40, log contrast sensitivity less than 1.5, or more than 30 points missing in the visual field. Use of compensatory strategies at baseline was reported as changing the frequency or method used to walk or climb stairs. Incident disability was defined as report of new difficulty in mobility at 2 years.

Results  Those using compensatory strategies at baseline were 3 times more likely to report incident disability in walking and stair-climbing, compared with persons who did not use compensatory strategies. Visual field impairment was the most significant predictor of incident mobility disability of all the vision measures studied. Among those with visual field impairment, users of compensatory strategies were 3 times more likely to report incident walking disability (95% confidence interval, 1.87-5.58) and incident stair-climbing disability (95% confidence interval, 1.86-4.83) compared with those who did not use compensatory strategies.

Conclusion  Preclinical disability, characterized by use of compensatory strategies in those with no disability, is a predictor for subsequent disability and may help identify patients with visual impairment for whom mobility interventions are warranted.

Author Affiliations: Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology (Dr West and Mss Munoz and Broman) and Lions Low Vision Center (Dr Turano), Wilmer Eye Institute, and Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health (Dr Bandeen-Roche), The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md; and Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, England (Dr Rubin).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of Physical Functioning: A Conceptual Model Encompassing Environmental Factors and Individual Compensation Strategies
Tomey and Sowers
ptjournal 2009;89:705-714.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transitions Among Disability Levels or Death in African American and White Older Women
Thorpe et al.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009;64A:670-674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain
Rahi et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1190-1194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT