You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Trial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Randomized Trial Assessing Dorzolamide in Patients With Glaucoma Who Are Younger Than 6 Years

Elyssa Z. Ott, BS; Monte D. Mills, MD; Santiago Arango, MD; Albert J. Getson, PhD; Christopher A. Assaid, PhD; Ingrid A. Adamsons, MD, MPH; for the Pediatric Dorzolamide Study Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1177-1186.

Objective  To evaluate dorzolamide hydrochloride in patients younger than 6 years who have an elevated intraocular pressure or glaucoma.

Design  A 3-month, controlled, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, clinical trial. Patients were randomized to 2% dorzolamide 3 times daily or timolol maleate gel-forming solution (0.25% for patients <2 years and 0.5% for patients ≥2 but <6 years) once daily plus placebo twice daily. If the intraocular pressure was not controlled through monotherapy, younger patients received concomitant dorzolamide 3 times daily and 0.25% timolol gel-forming solution once daily and older patients received a fixed combination of 2% dorzolamide and 0.5% timolol twice daily. The primary safety variable was the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy for a drug-related adverse experience. Intraocular pressure reduction was a secondary measure.

Results  One younger patient (1.8%) of 56 randomized to dorzolamide discontinued concomitant therapy because of bradycardia. Two older patients (3.0%) of 66 discontinued dorzolamide because of ocular adverse experiences. The most frequent ocular adverse experiences were discharge and ocular hyperemia (younger cohort) and ocular hyperemia and burning/stinging (older cohort). At week 12, the mean change in intraocular pressure for dorzolamide was statistically significant from baseline (–7.3 mm Hg [–20.6%] and –7.1 mm Hg [–23.3%]) in the younger and older cohorts, respectively; P<.001 for both.

Conclusion  Dorzolamide was generally well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy for up to 3 months in patients younger than 6 years.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Clinical Research (Ms Ott) and Biostatistics (Drs Getson and Assaid), and Clinical Risk Management and Safety Surveillance (Dr Adamsons), Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pa; Department of Ophthalmology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Mills); and Clinica Oftalmologia Sandiego, Medellin, Colombia (Dr Arango).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.