This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Macular Degeneration  • Alert me on articles by topic

Heather J. Smith, PhD; Christine M. Dickinson, PhD, MCOptom; Isabel Cacho, PhD, MCOptom; Barnaby C. Reeves, DPhil; Robert A. Harper, DPhil, MCOptom

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1042-1050.

Objective  To determine the effectiveness of prism spectacles in people with age-related macular degeneration by relocating the retinal image.

Methods  We implemented a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial. Participants with age-related macular degeneration received a standard low-vision assessment and the prescription of conventional low-vision aids 6 weeks before the study intervention. Participants were randomized to receive 1 of the following, including the optimal refractive correction: (1) custom, incorporating bilateral prisms to match participants’ preferred power and base direction; (2) standard, incorporating standard bilateral prisms (6 prism diopters [] base up for logMAR [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution] visual acuity (VA) of 0.48-1.00 and 10 base up for logMAR VA of 1.02-1.68); or (3) placebo, consisting of spectacles matched in weight and thickness to prism spectacles but without prism.

Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes measured binocularly at baseline and 3-month follow-up included distance logMAR VA, reading speed, critical print size, visual functioning questionnaires, and observed visual task performance. Scores on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire and the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Index were converted to linear estimates using Rasch analysis. The Manchester Low Vision Questionnaire was used to collect descriptive data.

Results  A total of 225 participants completed the trial (median age, 81 years). We found no significant effect of treatment group on any of the outcome measures, including VA, the primary outcome (adjusted for baseline) (P = .63). Participants’ responses to the Manchester Low Vision Questionnaire suggested that the prism spectacles added to their problems.

Conclusions  Prism spectacles are no more effective than conventional spectacles for people with age-related macular degeneration.

Author Affiliations: Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (Drs Smith, Dickinson, and Cacho), and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (Dr Harper), Manchester, England; and Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England (Dr Reeves).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT)
Stelmack et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:608-617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling of MNREAD Data
Cheung et al.
IOVS 2008;49:828-835.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rasch Analysis of the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision (DLTV)
Denny et al.
IOVS 2007;48:1976-1982.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: An Evaluation of Its Measurement Properties using Rasch Analysis
Lamoureux et al.
IOVS 2006;47:4732-4741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT