You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 7, July 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Twenty-four–Hour Control With Latanoprost-Timolol–Fixed Combination Therapy vs Latanoprost Therapy

Anastasios G. P. Konstas, MD, PhD; Kostantinos Boboridis, MD; Despina Tzetzi, MD; Kostantinos Kallinderis, MD; Jessica N. Jenkins, BS; William C. Stewart, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:898-902.

Objective  To evaluate the 24-hour efficacy and safety of the latanoprost-timolol maleate–fixed combination vs latanoprost therapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Methods  A prospective, observer-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomized comparison in which after a 6-week medicine-free period, patients were randomized to either latanoprost-timolol–fixed combination therapy or latanoprost therapy, both dosed once each evening, alone for 8 weeks. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for 8 weeks. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, a 24-hour diurnal curve was performed.

Results  The baseline untreated mean ± SD diurnal curve in 37 patients who completed the study was 24.2 ± 2.0 mm Hg. The mean diurnal curve was 19.2 ± 2.6 mm Hg for those who received latanoprost therapy alone and 16.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg for those who received the fixed combination therapy (P<.001). The fixed combination therapy also provided a lower absolute intraocular pressure level (1.5-2.9 mm Hg, P<.001) and a greater intraocular pressure reduction from the untreated baseline (P<.001). Stinging was statistically lower with latanoprost therapy alone (P = .04), but itching was statistically increased compared with the fixed combination therapy (P = .04).

Conclusion  The result of this study suggests that the latanoprost-timolol–fixed combination compared with latanoprost therapy alone provides improved intraocular pressure reduction over the 24-hour diurnal curve and for each individual time point in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.


Author Affiliations: Glaucoma Unit, University Department of Ophthalmology, Australasian Hellenic Educational Progressive Association Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece (Drs Konstas, Boboridis, Tzetzi, and Kallinderis); Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC, Charleston, SC (Ms Jenkins and Dr Stewart); and the South Carolina Eye Institute affiliated with the University of South Carolina, Columbia (Dr Stewart).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

24-Hour Control With a Latanoprost-Timolol Fixed Combination vs Timolol Alone.
Konstas et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1553-1557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.