You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 6, June 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Epidemiology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

A Population-Based Study on the Visual Outcome in 10-Year-Old Preterm and Full-Term Children

Eva K. Larsson, MD; Agneta C. Rydberg, PhD; Gerd E. Holmström, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:825-832.

Objectives  To report the visual outcome in prematurely born and full-term children at the age of 10 years and to evaluate the effects of prematurity per se, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and cryotreatment on visual acuity.

Methods  The study included 216 prematurely born children and 217 children born at term from the same geographical area and study period. Best-corrected distance and near visual acuities were assessed with linear letter logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution charts. Crowding was evaluated.

Results  Prematurely born children had reduced distance and near visual acuities compared with full-term children, even when children who had retinopathy of prematurity and neurologic disorders were excluded (P<.001). Children who had been treated with cryotherapy had the highest risk of a reduced visual acuity. Two percent of the prematurely born children were visually impaired (<20/60).

Conclusions  Although we found an overall good visual outcome in the prematurely born cohort, the risk of reduced visual acuity was greater than in full-term children. Children who had been treated with cryotherapy had the highest risk, but prematurity per se was also associated with reduced visual acuity.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala (Drs Larsson and Holmström); and the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (Dr Rydberg), Sweden.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Visual and cerebral sequelae of very low birth weight in adolescents
Hellgren et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F259-F264.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of astigmatism and anisometropia in preterm children during the first 10 years of life: a population-based study.
Larsson and Holmstrom
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1608-1614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contrast sensitivity in 10 year old preterm and full term children: a population based study
Larsson et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:87-90.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.