You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Vitreous Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Asteroid Hyalosis in an Autopsy Population

The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Experience

Amani A. Fawzi, MD; Baotran Vo, BS; Ryan Kriwanek; Hema L. Ramkumar, BS; Chris Cha, BS; Amy Carts; John R. Heckenlively, MD; Robert Y. Foos, MD, DVM{dagger}; Ben J. Glasgow, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:486-490.

Objectives  To study the prevalence and associations of asteroid hyalosis (AH) in a series of autopsy eyes.

Methods  Retrospective review of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) autopsy eye database from 1965 to 2000 yielded 10 801 patients. The patients’ medical histories were reviewed for evidence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, alcohol abuse, hypercalcemia, hypothyroidism, and chronic renal failure. Autopsy records were searched for evidence of optic atrophy, macular degeneration, posterior vitreous detachment, atherosclerosis, and chronic renal failure. Asteroid hyalosis was diagnosed by examination of the autopsy eyes. Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to analyze our data.

Results  The prevalence of AH was 1.96% in this autopsy population. By {chi}2 analysis, AH was significantly correlated with age (P<.001), male sex (P = .006), age-related macular degeneration (P = .02), hypertension (P = .03), atherosclerosis (P<.001), and posterior vitreous attachment (P<.001). After adjusting for age in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, statistical significance was found only for posterior vitreous attachment (P = .002) and male sex (P = .046). No statistically significant association was found with diabetes mellitus or alcohol abuse by univariate or multivariate analysis. Analysis of the odds ratio showed a strong age effect that increased from 5.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-11.3) in age group 41 to 50 years, compared with 25.4 (95% Wald confidence interval, 8.2-77.9) in the age group of patients older than 90 years.

Conclusions  A unique epidemiological autopsy cohort study of AH and its systemic associations yielded a higher prevalence of AH than previous studies. Asteroid hyalosis was strongly correlated with age and inversely correlated with posterior vitreous detachment. Unlike some previous reports, we found no statistically significant correlation between AH and diabetes mellitus.



Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute (Drs Fawzi, Heckenlively, and Glasgow; Messrs Kriwanek and Cha; and Mss Vo, Ramkumar, and Carts), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Drs Foos and Glasgow), The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles.
{dagger}Dr Foos died in November 2004.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.