You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Socioeconomics and Health Services
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmology, Other
 •Public Health
 •World Health
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Analysis of Costs and Benefits of the Gambian Eye Care Program

Kevin D. Frick, PhD; Allen Foster, FRCOphth; Momodou Bah, MSc; Hannah Faal, FRCOphth

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:239-243.

Objective  To estimate the net benefit of the Gambian Eye Care Program (GECP) using a limited definition of benefits from a societal perspective.

Methods  The number of cases of blindness avoided was modeled using population projections, population-based blindness survey estimates from 1986 and 1996, and reported blindness-related mortality differences. Benefits were measured as lifetime productivity gains that resulted from the cases of blindness avoided between the surveys. Costs included all contributions to GECP between the surveys.

Results  In 1996, 1658 fewer individuals were blind than would have been without GECP. The present value of costs was US $1.28 million (1995 dollars). Although the net benefit between the blindness surveys was negative, the net lifetime benefit was US $1.01 million (1995 dollars), yielding an internal rate of return of 10%. In the primary sensitivity analysis, assuming similar benefits to Senegalese citizens, who accounted for 30% of patients, the internal rate of return was 19%. Upper bound sensitivity analyses result in internal rates of return higher than 20%.

Conclusion  In one sub-Saharan African country with avoidable blindness due to cataract and eye infections, the internal rate of return of a national eye care program was substantial when using a limited definition of benefit.


Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Management, Health Services Research and Development Center, and Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health; Department of Economics; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine; and School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (Dr Frick); International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England (Dr Foster); and National Eye Care Program, Ministry of Health, Banjul, The Gambia (Mr Bah and Dr Faal).


RELATED ARTICLE

The Gambian Eye Care Program
Stephen A. Obstbaum
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(2):262.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Poverty and blindness in Pakistan: results from the Pakistan national blindness and visual impairment survey
Gilbert et al.
BMJ 2008;336:29-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The calculation and use of economic burden data.
Frick and Kymes
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:255-257.
FULL TEXT  

The economic impact and cost of visual impairment in Australia.
Taylor et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:272-275.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Gambian Eye Care Program
Obstbaum
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:262-262.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.