This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Macular Degeneration  • Radiologic Imaging  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

R. Theodore Smith, MD, PhD; Jackie K. Chan, MS; Takayuki Nagasaki, PhD; Umer F. Ahmad, MD; Irene Barbazetto, MD; Janet Sparrow, MD; Marta Figueroa, MD; Joanna Merriam, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:200-206.

Background  Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the most prevalent cause of visual loss in patients older than 60 years in the United States. Observation of drusen is the hallmark finding in the clinical evaluation of ARMD.

Objectives  To segment and quantify drusen found in patients with ARMD using image analysis and to compare the efficacy of image analysis segmentation with that of stereoscopic manual grading of drusen.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  University referral center.

Patients  Photographs were randomly selected from an available database of patients with known ARMD in the ongoing Columbia University Macular Genetics Study. All patients were white and older than 60 years.

Interventions  Twenty images from 17 patients were selected as representative of common manifestations of drusen. Image preprocessing included automated color balancing and, where necessary, manual segmentation of confounding lesions such as geographic atrophy (3 images). The operator then chose among 3 automated processing options suggested by predominant drusen type. Automated processing consisted of elimination of background variability by a mathematical model and subsequent histogram-based threshold selection. A retinal specialist using a graphic tablet while viewing stereo pairs constructed digital drusen drawings for each image.

Main Outcome Measures  The sensitivity and specificity of drusen segmentation using the automated method with respect to manual stereoscopic drusen drawings were calculated on a rigorous pixel-by-pixel basis.

Results  The median sensitivity and specificity of automated segmentation were 70% and 81%, respectively. After preprocessing and option choice, reproducibility of automated drusen segmentation was necessarily 100%.

Conclusions  Automated drusen segmentation can be reliably performed on digital fundus photographs and result in successful quantification of drusen in a more precise manner than is traditionally possible with manual stereoscopic grading of drusen. With only minor preprocessing requirements, this automated detection technique may dramatically improve our ability to monitor drusen in ARMD.

Author Affiliations: Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, New York Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (Drs Smith, Nagasaki, Ahmad, Barbazetto, Sparrow, and Merriam and Mr Chan); and Department of Ophthalmology, Ramon Y. Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain (Dr Figueroa).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Autofluorescence Characteristics of Early, Atrophic, and High-Risk Fellow Eyes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Smith et al.
IOVS 2006;47:5495-5504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictive value of fundus autofluorescence for development of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration.
Hwang et al.
IOVS 2006;47:2655-2661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT