You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laser Surgery
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Alcohol- vs Hypertonic Saline–Assisted Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy

Rossen Hazarbassanov, MD; Oded Ben-Haim, MD; David Varssano, MD; Aharon Grinbaum, MD; Igor Kaiserman, MD, MSc, MPA

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:171-176.

Objective  To evaluate the predictability and safety of hypertonic saline (5% sodium chloride)–assisted laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (HS-LASEK) vs 20% alcohol–assisted LASEK (A-LASEK).

Setting  American Laser Medical Center, Rishon Le-Zion, Israel.

Methods  Fifty-two consecutive eyes (26 patients) were randomized to HS-LASEK (30 eyes) and A-LASEK (22 eyes) groups. The patients’ eyes were examined, refracted, and photographed at 1 day, 5 days, 2 weeks, and 1 month postoperatively by a masked physician. Corneal topography and confocal examination were performed before and 1 month after surgery.

Main Outcome Measures  The predictability, accuracy, and visual recovery of HS-LASEK vs A-LASEK in the first postoperative month.

Results  The accuracy of HS-LASEK was similar and sometimes better than A-LASEK. Two weeks after surgery, 17 eyes (57%) in the HS-LASEK group and 10 eyes (46%) in the A-LASEK group were within ± 0.5 diopter of the intended refractive correction (P<.05). At all time points eyes in the HS-LASEK group had better best-corrected visual acuity than eyes in the A-LASEK group, although the uncorrected visual acuity was similar. Eighteen (61%) of the HS-LASEK–treated eyes and 12 (55%) of the A-LASEK–treated eyes had an epithelial defect after surgery. The HS-LASEK–treated eyes had significantly larger epithelial defects. The resolution of the defects was faster in the HS-LASEK–treated eyes (mean ± SD, 4.5 ± 0.4 days vs 5.8 ± 0.2 days, P = .002). The subepithelial scar was thicker in A-LASEK–treated eyes.

Conclusions  Hypertonic saline–assisted LASEK provides good postoperative accuracy, safety, and a similar rate of complications. In view of recent evidence regarding the epithelial toxic effects of alcohol, HS-LASEK might be a better treatment alternative.


Author Affiliations: American Lasers Medical Center, Rishon Le-Zion, Israel (Dr Hazarbassanov); Herzelia Medical Center, Herzelia, Israel (Dr Ben-Haim); Departments of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel (Dr Varssano); Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel (Dr Grinbaum); and Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel (Dr Kaiserman).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment in secondary glaucoma with corneal opacity after penetrating keratoplasty
Memarzadeh et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:189-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.