You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 11, November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Articles for Residents
 •Ocular/ Adnexal Tumors
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Drug Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Long-term Visual Outcome Following Chemoreduction for Retinoblastoma

Hakan Demirci, MD; Carol L. Shields, MD; Anna T. Meadows, MD; Jerry A. Shields, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1525-1530.

Objective  To evaluate long-term visual outcome following chemoreduction.

Design  Interventional case series evaluating 54 eyes of 40 children with retinoblastoma successfully treated with chemoreduction, consisting of a combination of intravenous carboplatin, etoposide phosphate, and vincristine sulfate plus focal therapy without external beam radiotherapy or enucleation. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years. Patient and tumor data were analyzed for their effect on the main outcome measures (final visual acuities of 20/40 or better and of 20/200 or better) using univariate and multivariate regression models. Patients who failed chemoreduction were excluded.

Results  There were 4 eyes in Reese-Ellsworth group I, 7 in group II, 3 in group III, 15 in group IV, and 25 in group V. The mean distance from the posterior tumor margin to the optic disc was 2 mm, and from the tumor margin to the foveola it was 3 mm. After a mean follow-up of 68 months, 27 eyes (50%) had a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 36 eyes (67%) had final visual acuity of 20/200 or better. Of 33 eyes with macular tumor, only 8 (24%) had a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 15 (45%) had a final visual acuity of 20/200 or better. Of 21 eyes with extramacular tumor, 19 (90%) had a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and all (100%) had a final visual acuity of 20/200 or better.

Conclusion  The clinical factors that predicted visual acuity of 20/40 or better were a tumor margin at least 3 mm from the foveola and optic disc and an absence of subretinal fluid.


Author Affiliations: Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University (Drs Demirci, C. L. Shields, and J. A. Shields), and Division of Oncology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (Dr Meadows), Philadelphia, Pa.


RELATED ARTICLE

Restoration of Foveal Anatomy and Function Following Chemoreduction for Bilateral Advanced Retinoblastoma With Total Retinal Detachment
Carol L. Shields, Miguel A. Materin, and Jerry A. Shields
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(11):1610-1612.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Restoration of Foveal Anatomy and Function Following Chemoreduction for Bilateral Advanced Retinoblastoma With Total Retinal Detachment
Shields et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1610-1612.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.