You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 9, September 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Additivity of Bimatoprost or Travoprost to Latanoprost in Glaucomatous Monkey Eyes

Donna J. Gagliuso, MD; Rong-Fang Wang, MD; Thomas W. Mittag, PhD; Steven M. Podos, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1342-1347.

Objective  To compare the ocular hypotensive effect of the commercially available preparations of bimatoprost or travoprost added to latanoprost in monkey eyes with laser-induced unilateral glaucoma.

Methods  Four monkeys with unilateral laser-induced glaucoma were used in each treatment group and received drops in the glaucomatous eye only. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured hourly for 6 hours, beginning at 9:30 AM on day 1 (untreated baseline), days 6 and 7 (single-agent therapy), and days 13 and 14 (2-drug combination therapy). On days 2 through 7, 1 drop of the scheduled single agent was given immediately after the 9:30 AM IOP measurement, and on days 8 through 14, the second scheduled drug was given 5 minutes after the first. The following 5 different dosing protocols were studied: latanoprost with bimatoprost added, bimatoprost with latanoprost added, latanoprost with travoprost added, travoprost with latanoprost added, and latanoprost with a second dose of latanoprost added.

Results  There were no statistically significant (P = .95) differences among the mean baseline IOPs in any of the 5 treatment groups. When applied as single agents, latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost all produced significant (P<.05) and equivalent (P = .98) reductions in IOP. The mean ±SEM maximum reduction (P<.05) from baseline IOP was 7.0 ± 0.4 mm Hg (20% reduction) with travoprost alone, 6.5 ± 1.6 mm Hg (18%) with bimatoprost alone, and 7.5 ± 1.0 mm Hg (22%) with latanoprost alone. The mean ±SEM maximum additive reductions in IOP were 3.0 ± 0.6 mm Hg (P<.05) for travoprost added to latanoprost; 2.0 ± 0.4 mm Hg (P<.05) for latanoprost added to travoprost; 4.8 ± 1.3 mm Hg (P<.05) for bimatoprost added to latanoprost; 4.3 ± 0.6 mm Hg (P<.05) for latanoprost added to bimatoprost; and 0.3 ± 0.5 mm Hg (P>.60) for latanoprost added to itself. The combination of bimatoprost and latanoprost produced a greater (P<.05) lowering of IOP at trough and peak than the combination of travoprost and latanoprost.

Conclusions  Latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost used as monotherapy produced significant and equivalent reductions in IOP in glaucomatous monkey eyes. The IOP effects of the commercial concentrations of bimatoprost or travoprost were additive to that of latanoprost, with bimatoprost showing a greater additive response than travoprost.

Clinical Relevance  Because treatment with multiple medications is common among patients with glaucoma, determining which glaucoma medications produce an additive ocular hypotensive response when used in combination has practical implications for clinicians.


From the Department of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University, New York. Dr Podos is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc; Allergan, Inc; Sucampo, Inc; and Pfizer, Inc.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.