This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (25)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Glaucoma  • Articles for Residents  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Carolyn Y. Shih, MD; Joshua S. Graff Zivin, PhD; Stephen L. Trokel, MD; James C. Tsai, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1270-1275.

Objective  To evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness determination on the clinical management of patients with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect.

Methods  A cross-sectional retrospective study was performed on 188 consecutive patients. Mean ultrasound pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness and corresponding Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements were obtained. Intraocular pressures (IOPs) were corrected using linear and mathematical (Orssengo-Pye) algorithms. Measurement-significant outcomes were defined as an IOP adjustment of 1.5 mm Hg or greater and outcomes-significant results as an IOP adjustment of 3.0 mm Hg or greater. Changes in therapy such as the use of eyedrops and addition or cancellation of laser therapy or surgery were then noted for those individuals with measurement- or outcomes-significant changes.

Results  Using the linear correction scale, 105 (55.9%) of 188 patients had at least a measurement-significant adjustment in their IOP measurements: 67 (35.6%) had adjustments between 1.5 and 3.0 mm Hg, while 38 (20.2%) had an outcomes-significant IOP adjustment (3.0 mm Hg). Among the 188 patients, 16 (8.5%) had a change in eyedrop therapy, 4 (2.1%) had a change regarding laser therapy, and 6 (3.2%) had a change in the decision regarding glaucoma surgery. Using the exponential correction (Orssengo-Pye) scale, similar percentages were obtained.

Conclusion  Pachymetry-measured central corneal thickness has a significant effect on the clinical management of patients with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect.

From the Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Physicians and Surgeons (Drs Shih, Trokel, and Tsai), and Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health (Dr Graff Zivin), Columbia University, New York, NY. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reproducibility and Clinical Relevance of the Ocular Response Analyzer in Nonoperated Eyes: Corneal Biomechanical and Tonometric Implications
Moreno-Montanes et al.
IOVS 2008;49:968-974.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer
Gonzalez-Meijome et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1495-1500.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are we there yet? Celebrating the centennial of the schiotz tonometer.
Ravin and Higginbotham
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1337-1338.
FULL TEXT  

Glaucoma and increased central corneal thickness in aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery
Simsek et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1103-1106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Longitudinal changes in central corneal thickness and their relation to glaucoma status: an 8 year follow up study
Weizer et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:732-736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Structural Abnormalities of the Cornea and Lid Resulting from Collagen V Mutations
Segev et al.
IOVS 2006;47:565-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anterior Optic Nerve Capillary Blood Flow Response to Diurnal Variation of Mean Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Early Untreated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Sehi et al.
IOVS 2005;46:4581-4587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underestimate of Tonometric Readings after Photorefractive Keratectomy Increases at Higher Intraocular Pressure Levels
Tamburrelli et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3208-3213.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT