You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 7, July 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Effect on Visual Outcome After Macular Hole Surgery When Staining the Internal Limiting Membrane With Indocyanine Green Dye

Naoichi Horio, MD; Masayuki Horiguchi, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:992-996.

Objectives  To determine the effect on the visual outcome after macular hole surgery when staining the internal limiting membrane (ILM) with indocyanine green (ICG) dye and to study the mechanism of the adverse effects.

Patients and Methods  We studied 40 eyes of 38 patients with an idiopathic macular hole (size, <0.5 disc diameter; duration, <12 months). The concentration, exposure time, and amount of the ICG solution that was minimally required to make the ILM visible were determined. The patients were randomly divided into group 1 (20 eyes of 19 patients) who underwent ILM peeling without ICG staining, and group 2 (20 eyes of 19 patients) who underwent ILM peeling with ICG staining. Routine examinations were conducted during the 12-month follow-up period. Multifocal electroretinogram, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography were performed on 31 eyes of 30 patients.

Results  The macular hole was closed in all patients. Visual acuity was improved in both groups, but it was significantly better in group 1 (median, 0.85) than in group 2 (median, 0.60; P = .02) after 12 months. The improvement of visual acuity in group 1 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units [SD], 0.82 [0.19]) was significantly better than that in group 2 (logMAR units, 0.67 [0.21]; P = .30). The multifocal electroretinogram and optical coherence tomographic findings were not significantly different in the 2 groups. Fluorescein angiogram showed only weak hyperfluorescence at the macula in some patients of both groups.

Conclusions  The results suggest that ICG staining should not be used as long as the visibility of the retinal surface is good. However, ICG staining may be acceptable at a low concentration when a clear view of the retinal surface is unattainable. The results of the multifocal electroretinogram, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography suggest that the differences in visual recovery were caused not only by pigment epithelial cell damage or retinal toxic effect but also probably by the effect of ICG staining on ganglion cells and their axons.


From the Department of Ophthalmology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Residual indocyanine green fluorescence pattern after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole with internal limiting membrane peeling
Sayanagi et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:939-944.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling With Indocyanine Green or Trypan Blue in Macular Hole Surgery: A Randomized Trial
Beutel et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:326-332.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.
Williams
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1216-1217.
FULL TEXT  

Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling
Tadayoni et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1239-1241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Amplitude Reduction of the PhNR after Macular Hole Surgery: Ganglion Cell Damage Related to ICG-Assisted ILM Peeling and Gas Tamponade.
Ueno et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3545-3549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retinal Toxicity of Indocyanine Green in Albino Rabbits
Goldstein et al.
IOVS 2006;47:2100-2107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retinal ganglion cells toxicity caused by photosensitising effects of intravitreal indocyanine green with illumination in rat eyes
Yip et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:99-102.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chemical Toxicity of Indocyanine Green Damages Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Ikagawa et al.
IOVS 2005;46:2531-2539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Indocyanine green accused
Jackson
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:395-396.
FULL TEXT  

Triamcinolone-Assisted Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling During Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery
Horio et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:96-99.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.