You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Mechanisms of Ophthalmologic Disease
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Outer Retinal Degeneration

An Electronic Retinal Prosthesis as a Treatment Strategy

John I. Loewenstein, MD; Sandra R. Montezuma, MD; Joseph F. Rizzo III, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:587-596.

Objective  To review progress toward an electronic retinal prosthesis for outer retinal degeneration.

Method  Literature review.

Results  Retinal degenerations such as retinitis pigmentosa result in a loss of photoreceptors. There is a secondary loss of inner retinal cells, but significant numbers of bipolar and ganglion cells remain for many years. Electrical stimulation can produce phosphenes in the eyes of individuals who are blind as a result of retinitis pigmentosa. Several research groups are trying to exploit this phenomenon to produce artificial vision with electronic retinal prostheses. Two groups, with private company sponsorship, have recently implanted first-generation devices in subjects with advanced retinitis pigmentosa. They have reported limited preliminary results. This article seeks to put these results in a broader context and review potential obstacles to successful prosthesis development. These include inner retinal cell viability, high thresholds, signal encoding, power requirements, biocompatibility, and device encapsulation.

Conclusion  There has been substantial progress toward an electronic retinal prosthesis, but fully functional, long-lasting devices are not on the immediate horizon.


From the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Mass (Drs Loewenstein, Montezuma, and Rizzo), and the Veterans' Administration Center for Innovative Rehabilitation, Boston (Dr Rizzo). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors Affecting Perceptual Thresholds in Epiretinal Prostheses
de Balthasar et al.
IOVS 2008;49:2303-2314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Resolution Electrical Stimulation of Primate Retina for Epiretinal Implant Design
Sekirnjak et al.
J. Neurosci. 2008;28:4446-4456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emergence of Sustained Spontaneous Hyperactivity and Temporary Preservation of OFF Responses in Ganglion Cells of the Retinal Degeneration (rd1) Mouse
Stasheff
J. Neurophysiol. 2008;99:1408-1421.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optokinetic Nystagmus as a Measure of Visual Function in Severely Visually Impaired Patients
Wester et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4542-4548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perspectives on: Materials Aspects for Retinal Prostheses
Scholz
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 2007;22:539-568.
ABSTRACT  

Biocompatibility of materials implanted into the subretinal space of yucatan pigs.
Montezuma et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3514-3522.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.