You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Epidemiology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Optics/ Refraction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among Adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia

The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group*

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:495-505.

Objective  To estimate the prevalence of refractive errors in persons 40 years and older.

Methods  Counts of persons with phakic eyes with and without spherical equivalent refractive error in the worse eye of +3 diopters (D) or greater, –1 D or less, and –5 D or less were obtained from population-based eye surveys in strata of gender, race/ethnicity, and 5-year age intervals. Pooled age-, gender-, and race/ethnicity–specific rates for each refractive error were applied to the corresponding stratum-specific US, Western European, and Australian populations (years 2000 and projected 2020).

Results  Six studies provided data from 29 281 persons. In the US, Western European, and Australian year 2000 populations 40 years or older, the estimated crude prevalence for hyperopia of +3 D or greater was 9.9%, 11.6%, and 5.8%, respectively (11.8 million, 21.6 million, and 0.47 million persons). For myopia of –1 D or less, the estimated crude prevalence was 25.4%, 26.6%, and 16.4% (30.4 million, 49.6 million, and 1.3 million persons), respectively, of whom 4.5%, 4.6%, and 2.8% (5.3 million, 8.5 million, and 0.23 million persons), respectively, had myopia of –5 D or less. Projected prevalence rates in 2020 were similar.

Conclusions  Refractive errors affect approximately one third of persons 40 years or older in the United States and Western Europe, and one fifth of Australians in this age group.


*The Writing Group members for the Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group who had complete access to the raw data needed for this report and who bear authorship responsibility for this report are John H. Kempen, MD, PhD (Chairperson); Paul Mitchell, MD, PhD; Kristine E. Lee, MS; James M. Tielsch, PhD; Aimee T. Broman, MA; Hugh R. Taylor, MD; M. Kamran Ikram, MSc, MD; Nathan G. Congdon, MD, MPH; Benita J. O'Colmain, MPH; and David S. Friedman, MD, MPH. The Writing Group for this article has no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children
Dirani et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:997-1000.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Older Adults for Impaired Visual Acuity: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Chou et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:44-58.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An International Collaborative Family-Based Whole-Genome Linkage Scan for High-Grade Myopia
Li et al.
IOVS 2009;50:3116-3127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genomewide Linkage Scans for Ocular Refraction and Meta-analysis of Four Populations in the Myopia Family Study
Wojciechowski et al.
IOVS 2009;50:2024-2032.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Absence of Association between COL1A1 Polymorphisms and High Myopia in the Japanese Population
Nakanishi et al.
IOVS 2009;50:544-550.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating Heritability and Shared Environmental Effects for Refractive Error in Twin and Family Studies
Lopes et al.
IOVS 2009;50:126-131.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Global Vision Impairment Due to Uncorrected Presbyopia
Holden et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1731-1739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence of Shared Genes in Refraction and Axial Length: The Genes in Myopia (GEM) Twin Study
Dirani et al.
IOVS 2008;49:4336-4339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myopia and the Urban Environment: Findings in a Sample of 12-Year-Old Australian School Children
Ip et al.
IOVS 2008;49:3858-3863.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adult-Onset Myopia: The Genes in Myopia (GEM) Twin Study
Dirani et al.
IOVS 2008;49:3324-3327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Refractive Error in the United States, 1999-2004
Vitale et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1111-1119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of breastfeeding and sociodemographic factors on visual outcome in childhood and adolescence
Rudnicka et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:1392-1399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Reported Age-Related Eye Diseases and Visual Impairment in the United States: Results of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey
Ryskulova et al.
AJPH 2008;98:454-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of TGIF as a Candidate Gene for Myopia
Pertile et al.
IOVS 2008;49:49-54.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Roles of PAX6 and SOX2 in Myopia: Lessons from the 1958 British Birth Cohort
Simpson et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4421-4425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Linkage Replication of the MYP12 Locus in Common Myopia
Chen et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4433-4439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heritability and Familial Aggregation of Refractive Error in the Old Order Amish
Peet et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4002-4006.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Complex Trait Genetics of Refractive Error
Young et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:38-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Economic Burden of Major Adult Visual Disorders in the United States
Rein et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1754-1760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

6220 institutionalised people with intellectual disability referred for visual assessment between 1993 and 2003: overview and trends
van Isterdael et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1297-1303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myopic Refractive Error in Adult Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study
Tarczy-Hornoch et al.
IOVS 2006;47:1845-1852.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The epidemiology of age related eye diseases in Asia.
Wong et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:506-511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors associated with spectacle-wear compliance in school-aged mexican children.
Holguin et al.
IOVS 2006;47:925-928.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nine-Year Refractive Changes in the Barbados Eye Studies
Wu et al.
IOVS 2005;46:4032-4039.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Distribution of Ocular Biometric Parameters and Refraction in a Population-Based Study of Australian Children
Ojaimi et al.
IOVS 2005;46:2748-2754.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship of Age, Sex, and Ethnicity With Myopia Progression and Axial Elongation in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial
Hyman et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:977-987.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heritability of Refractive Error and Familial Aggregation of Myopia in an Elderly American Population
Wojciechowski et al.
IOVS 2005;46:1588-1592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among Adults in Europe
Midelfart and Midelfart
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:580-580.
FULL TEXT  

Sex Matters in Glaucoma--Reply
Higginbotham
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:284-284.
FULL TEXT  

Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the United States
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.