You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 12, December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Trial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Optics/ Refraction
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Rigid Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression

Jeffrey J. Walline, OD, PhD; Lisa A. Jones, PhD; Donald O. Mutti, OD, PhD; Karla Zadnik, OD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1760-1766.

Objective  To compare the effects of rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGPs) and soft contact lenses (SCLs) on myopia progression in children.

Methods  We randomly assigned 116 subjects to wear RGPs or SCLs. Subjects underwent cycloplegic autorefraction, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonographic axial length measurements at each annual visit. All analyses were conducted according to the original randomization assignment. The primary outcome measure was the 3-year change in spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction.

Results  The mean ± SD spherical equivalent cycloplegic refractive error progressed –1.56 ± 0.95 diopters (D) for RGP wearers and –2.19 ± 0.89 D for the SCL wearers during the 3 years of the study (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], P<.001). The axial growth of the eyes was not significantly different between treatment groups (ANCOVA, P = .57). The steep corneal meridian of the RGP wearers steepened 0.62 ± 0.60 D, and that of the SCL wearers steepened 0.88 ± 0.57 D during the 3 years (ANCOVA, P = .01).

Conclusions  The RGP wearers’ myopia progressed less than that of the SCL wearers. The corneal curvature of the SCL wearers steepened more than that of the RGP wearers, but the axial growth was not significantly different between the groups. Most refractive error treatment effect was limited to the first year of the trial. The results of the study provide information for eye care practitioners to share with their patients, but they do not indicate that RGPs should be prescribed primarily for myopia control.


Author Affiliations: The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Corneal reshaping and myopia progression
Walline et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1181-1185.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children
Walline et al.
IOVS 2008;49:4702-4706.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parental History of Myopia, Sports and Outdoor Activities, and Future Myopia
Jones et al.
IOVS 2007;48:3524-3532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of Parental Myopia in the Progression of Myopia and Its Interaction with Treatment in COMET Children
Kurtz et al.
IOVS 2007;48:562-570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contact Lenses Alter Corneal Curvature
Davidorf
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1455-1455.
FULL TEXT  

Contact Lenses Alter Corneal Curvature--Reply
Walline et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1455-1455.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.