You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 1, January 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Racial Differences in Optic Disc Topography

Baseline Results From the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study

Linda M. Zangwill, PhD; Robert N. Weinreb, MD; Charles C. Berry, PhD; Amanda R. Smith, MPH; Keri A. Dirkes, MPH; Anne L. Coleman, MD, PhD; Jody R. Piltz-Seymour, MD; Jeffrey M. Liebmann, MD; George A. Cioffi, MD; Gary Trick, PhD; James D. Brandt, MD; Mae O. Gordon, PhD; Michael A. Kass, MD; for the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:22-28.

Objective  To examine racial differences in optic disc topography among ocular hypertensive participants in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Methods  Four hundred thirty-nine participants from 7 Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study centers who had good-quality baseline images obtained using a quantitative 3-dimensional confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), were included in this study. The first 10°- or 15°-field of view mean topographic image acquired was included in all analyses. Differences in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph topographic optic disc parameter measurements by self-identified race were assessed using a mixed-effects linear model to control for confounders and for the use of both eyes in the model.

Results  By self-attribution, 74 (17%) of the 439 participants were of African origin, 329 (75%) were white, 24 (5%) were Hispanic, and 12 (3%) were Native American, Native Alaskan, Asian, Pacific Islander, or unknown. The African American participants had statistically significantly (P<.001) larger mean (SD) optic disc areas than the other participants, 2.17 (0.41) mm2 vs 1.87 (0.38) mm2, respectively. African American participants had a larger cup area, cup volume, cup depth, neuroretinal rim area, rim volume, and smaller rim–optic disc area ratios than the other participants. No difference between African American and the other participants was found for cup shape and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. After controlling for optic disc area, none of the differences between African American and the other participants found in the univariate analysis remained statistically significant (P>.10).

Conclusions  This study demonstrated in a large cohort of subjects with ocular hypertension, that African Americans have significantly larger optic discs, optic cups, neuroretinal rims, and cup-disc ratios than other racial groups. Furthermore, this study found that differences in topographic optic disc parameters between African Americans with ocular hypertension and other racial groups are largely explained by the larger optic disc area in the African Americans. These results highlight the need to consider race and optic disc size when evaluating the appearance of the optic disc in glaucoma.


From the Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Zangwill and Weinreb and Mss Smith and Dirkes) and Family and Preventive Medicine (Dr Berry), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla; Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Coleman); Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Piltz-Seymour); New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York (Dr Liebmann); Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Ore (Dr Cioffi); Henry Ford Medical Center, Troy, Mich (Dr Trick); University of California, Davis, Sacramento (Dr Brandt); and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (Drs Gordon and Kass).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neural Rim Characteristics of Healthy South Indians: The Chennai Glaucoma Study
Arvind et al.
IOVS 2008;49:3457-3464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Central corneal thickness and correlation to optic disc size: a potential link for susceptibility to glaucoma
Pakravan et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:26-28.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Axial length and optic disc size in normal eyes
Oliveira et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:37-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III
Harizman et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1390-1392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in Visual Function and Optic Nerve Structure Between Healthy Eyes of Blacks and Whites
Racette et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1547-1553.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Topographic Optic Disc Measurements Are Associated With the Development of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Zangwill et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1188-1197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.