You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 9, September 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Macular Disorders
 •Uveitis
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Volumetric Analysis of Macular Edema by Scanning Laser Tomography in Immune Recovery Uveitis

Dirk-Uwe G. Bartsch, PhD; Ajay Aurora, MD; Nuttawut Rodanant, MD; Lingyun Cheng, MD; William R. Freeman, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1246-1251.

Objectives  To evaluate the macular volume in eyes with immune recovery uveitis (IRU) and to describe a new method to quantify macular edema with the use of confocal scanning laser tomography (cSLT).

Methods  A prospective study was performed to assess the macular volume with cSLT in patients with and without IRU. None of the patients enrolled had cytomegalovirus retinitis within 3000 µm of the fovea. Eight eyes had healed cytomegalovirus retinitis with IRU and cystoid macular edema (group A); 4 eyes had healed cytomegalovirus retinitis with IRU and clinically normal maculas (group B); 18 eyes had no IRU (group C); and 3 eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peeling for epiretinal membranes associated with cystoid macular edema and IRU (group D). Patients with IRU underwent standard clinical examinations and cSLT. On cSLT, volume above the reference plane was calculated within a fovea-centered circle of 3 mm in diameter. We devised a novel system for defining the reference plane. Measurements were performed 3 times in masked fashion and the mean was used for analyses.

Results  The mean macular volume was highest in group A (1.97 mm3). This was significantly higher (P<.001) than that in groups B (1.15 mm3), C (1.02 mm3), and D (0.86 mm3).

Conclusions  Macular edema in patients with IRU can be consistently and objectively quantitated by cSLT. The method of defining the reference plane used in our study is novel and can be used in other disorders causing macular edema.


From the University of California, San Diego, Shiley Eye Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif. Dr Aurora is now with the Dr Shroff Charity Eye Hospital, Daryaganj, New Delhi, India. The University of California, San Diego, Shiley Eye Center has received unrestricted research support from Heidelberg Engineering.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.