You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 9, September 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Articles for Residents
 •Glaucoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparison of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Using Standard Full Threshold and Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithms

Donald L. Budenz, MD; Paul Rhee, OD; William J. Feuer, MS; John McSoley, OD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD; Douglas R. Anderson, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1136-1141.

Objectives  To compare the severity, size, and depth of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold (FT), Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) standard (SS), and SITA fast (SF) algorithms of the Humphrey perimeter.

Methods  A prospective observational case series of 77 patients with glaucoma performed FT, SS, and SF 30-2 white-on-white testing programs on the same day on 2 occasions for 1 month. The severity of defects was compared using the mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, and Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish severity scores. The sizes of defects were compared using the total number of abnormal points on the pattern deviation plot that fit standard criteria for glaucomatous visual field defects. The depths of the defects were compared using the sum of the threshold values for points identified in the pattern deviation plot as fitting criteria for glaucomatous defects.

Results  The mean deviations were slightly better using the SS (-9.6 ± 7.1 dB) or the SF (-9.1 ± 6.7 dB) algorithm compared with the FT algorithm (-10.3 ± 7.1 dB) (P<.005). There were no significant differences in pattern standard deviations between SS (8.6 ± 4.0, P = .08) and SF (8.1 ± 3.6, P = .19) compared with FT (8.3 ± 3.3), although the pattern standard deviation was higher in SS fields compared with SF fields (P<.001). Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study scores were slightly better when the SS (7.5 ± 5.6) or SF (7.2 ± 5.4) algorithm was used compared with the FT algorithm (8.6 ± 5.4) (P<.001). The sizes of glaucomatous defects were slightly larger using the SS (20.9 ± 10.7) algorithm compared with the FT algorithm (19.2 ± 10.9) (P = .004) but not the SF algorithm (20.0 ± 10.6) (P = .11). The depth of defects measured by the SS (220.4 ± 108.0 dB) and SF (219.8 ± 101.3 dB) algorithms was significantly shallower compared with that measured by the FT algorithm (152.3 ± 79.1 dB) (P<.001). There were no significant differences in Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish severity scores among algorithms (P = .12).

Conclusions  Glaucomatous defects are measured significantly shallower using the new SITA algorithms but are approximately the same size and severity compared with FT measurements. Care should be taken when using threshold values to compare glaucomatous defects in a patient when converting from FT to SITA algorithms.


From the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Drs Budenz, Rhee, McSoley, and Anderson and Mr Feuer), and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento (Dr Johnson). Dr Johnson is now affiliated with Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Ore.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Estimating the Rate of Progressive Visual Field Damage in Those with Open-Angle Glaucoma, from Cross-Sectional Data
Broman et al.
IOVS 2008;49:66-76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample et al.
IOVS 2006;47:3381-3389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma.
Harwerth and Quigley
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:853-859.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship of SITA and Full-Threshold Standard Perimetry to Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry in Glaucoma
Boden et al.
IOVS 2005;46:2433-2439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oxidative DNA Damage in the Human Trabecular Meshwork: Clinical Correlation in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Sacca et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:458-463.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Properties of Perimetric Threshold Estimates from Full Threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like Strategies, as Determined by Computer Simulation
Turpin et al.
IOVS 2003;44:4787-4795.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.