 |
 |

Quantitative Electroretinogram Measures of Phototransduction in Cone and Rod Photoreceptors
Normal Aging, Progression With Disease, and Test-Retest Variability
David G. Birch, PhD;
Donald C. Hood, PhD;
Kirsten G. Locke, RN, CRA;
Dennis R. Hoffman, PhD;
Radoul T. Tzekov, MD, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1045-1051.
Objectives To determine (1) reference values for cone and rod phototransduction
variables derived from the a-wave of the electroretinogram, (2) their dependence
on age, (3) the progression in cone and rod variables in patients with X-linked
retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP), and (4) the test-retest variability in these
a-wave measures compared with the variability in cone and rod b-wave measures.
Participants One hundred control subjects aged 5 to 75 years and 24 patients with
XLRP aged 5 to 38 years.
Methods High-intensity stimuli were used to elicit electroretinograms in the
dark and in the presence of a rod-saturating background. Computer averaging
and computer subtraction of cone components from mixed rod-cone responses
were used to derive rod-only and cone a-waves. Rod and cone phototransduction
variables were derived by computer fitting physiologically based computational
models to the leading edges of a-wave ensembles.
Results Phototransduction efficiency, as indexed by the sensitivity variable
(S), decreased with age for cone and rod-only responses,
whereas maximum cone and rod photoresponses (RmP3) remained constant. In patients with XLRP tested annually for 4 years, RmP3 for rods and, to a lesser extent, cones
declined with disease progression, whereas S remained
stable. The test-retest variability in the a-wave RmP3 is lower than previously reported measures of the variability in
b-wave peak-to-peak amplitude.
Conclusion The leading edge of the a-wave of the electroretinogram can be related
to rod and cone phototransduction variables through quantitative models. RmP3, rather than S,
should be the outcome measure of choice when using the a-wave to follow photoreceptor
function in prospective studies and treatment trials.
From the Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Tex (Drs Birch
and Hoffman and Ms Locke); the Department of Ophthalmology, The University
of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas (Dr Birch); Department of Psychology,
Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Hood); and Department of Ophthalmology,
University of California, Davis (Dr Tzekov).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Contribution of voltage-gated sodium channels to the b-wave of the mammalian flash electroretinogram
Mojumder et al.
J. Physiol. 2008;586:2551-2580.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Aging and Age-Related Maculopathy on Activation of the a-Wave of the Rod-Mediated Electroretinogram
Jackson et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3271-3278.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cone and Rod ERG Phototransduction Parameters in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Tzekov et al.
IOVS 2003;44:3993-4000.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|