You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 8, August 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmological Disorders, Other
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quantitative Electroretinogram Measures of Phototransduction in Cone and Rod Photoreceptors

Normal Aging, Progression With Disease, and Test-Retest Variability

David G. Birch, PhD; Donald C. Hood, PhD; Kirsten G. Locke, RN, CRA; Dennis R. Hoffman, PhD; Radoul T. Tzekov, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1045-1051.

Objectives  To determine (1) reference values for cone and rod phototransduction variables derived from the a-wave of the electroretinogram, (2) their dependence on age, (3) the progression in cone and rod variables in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP), and (4) the test-retest variability in these a-wave measures compared with the variability in cone and rod b-wave measures.

Participants  One hundred control subjects aged 5 to 75 years and 24 patients with XLRP aged 5 to 38 years.

Methods  High-intensity stimuli were used to elicit electroretinograms in the dark and in the presence of a rod-saturating background. Computer averaging and computer subtraction of cone components from mixed rod-cone responses were used to derive rod-only and cone a-waves. Rod and cone phototransduction variables were derived by computer fitting physiologically based computational models to the leading edges of a-wave ensembles.

Results  Phototransduction efficiency, as indexed by the sensitivity variable (S), decreased with age for cone and rod-only responses, whereas maximum cone and rod photoresponses (RmP3) remained constant. In patients with XLRP tested annually for 4 years, RmP3 for rods and, to a lesser extent, cones declined with disease progression, whereas S remained stable. The test-retest variability in the a-wave RmP3 is lower than previously reported measures of the variability in b-wave peak-to-peak amplitude.

Conclusion  The leading edge of the a-wave of the electroretinogram can be related to rod and cone phototransduction variables through quantitative models. RmP3, rather than S, should be the outcome measure of choice when using the a-wave to follow photoreceptor function in prospective studies and treatment trials.


From the Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Tex (Drs Birch and Hoffman and Ms Locke); the Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas (Dr Birch); Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Hood); and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis (Dr Tzekov).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Contribution of voltage-gated sodium channels to the b-wave of the mammalian flash electroretinogram
Mojumder et al.
J. Physiol. 2008;586:2551-2580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Aging and Age-Related Maculopathy on Activation of the a-Wave of the Rod-Mediated Electroretinogram
Jackson et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3271-3278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cone and Rod ERG Phototransduction Parameters in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Tzekov et al.
IOVS 2003;44:3993-4000.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.