You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Glaucoma
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Enzymatic Sclerostomy

Pilot Human Study

Jacob A. Dan, MD, PhD; Santosh G. Honavar, MD; David A. Belyea, MD; Anil K. Mandal, MD; Chandrasekhar Garudadri, MD; Brian Levy, OD, MSc; Rengappa Ramakrishnan, MD; Ramasamy Krishnadas, MD; Marc F. Lieberman, MD; Robert L. Stamper, MD; Arieh Yaron, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:548-553.

Objective  To evaluate the feasibility and safety of enzymatic sclerostomy as a new modality to lower intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Methods  This single-center, prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series included 15 blind symptomatic eyes of 15 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Enzymatic sclerostomy was performed with the patient under topical or peribulbar anesthesia. A specially designed polymethylmethacrylate enzyme applicator filled with a mean ± SD of 123 ± 13 µg of collagenase was introduced through a 5-mm peritomy, and affixed to the limbus by means of cyanoacrylate tissue glue. After 22 to 24 hours, the applicators were removed and the patients were followed up for 1 year. Intraocular pressure changes from baseline and complications related to the procedure were the main outcome measures.

Results  Controlled thinning of the treated sclera associated with aqueous percolation and shallow filtration bleb was seen in all eyes in the immediate postoperative period. The mean ± SD intraocular pressure decreased from 43.5 ± 9.8 mm Hg (while the patients were receiving a mean ± SD of 1.75 ± 0.75 antiglaucoma medications) preoperatively to 24.8 ± 10.6 mm Hg (a 43.0% decrease from baseline with no antiglaucoma medication) on the first postoperative day and to 34.8 ± 10.5 mm Hg (a 20.0% decrease from baseline with no antiglaucoma medication) at the end of 1 year. Ophthalmic adverse effects were limited to the treated area and included immediate postoperative transient conjunctival reaction ranging from mild chemosis to conjunctival maceration. Immediate full-thickness perforation developed in 1 eye; the patient was treated and excluded from data analysis. Two eyes developed symptoms related to increase in intraocular pressure after 9 months; the patients were treated and excluded from further data analysis. No systemic complications were noted.

Conclusions  Enzymatic sclerostomy demonstrated immediate and sustained intraocular pressure reduction and provided symptomatic relief in blind eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. The procedure, however, needs further technical refinement.


From Revivim-Zahala Medical Consultants, Tel Aviv, Israel (Dr Dan); Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel (Drs Dan and Yaron); VST Center for Glaucoma Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India (Drs Honavar, Mandal, and Garudadri); Department of Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC (Drs Dan and Belyea); Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY (Dr Levy); Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India (Drs Ramakrishnan and Krishnadas); and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Lieberman and Stamper). The Weizmann Institute of Science, and Drs Dan and Yaron have a proprietary interest in the materials and the methods used in this study.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

A Need for Innovation in Glaucoma Surgery
M. Roy Wilson
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(5):633.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(5):679-680.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Human Scleral Hydraulic Conductivity: Age-Related Changes, Topographical Variation, and Potential Scleral Outflow Facility
Jackson et al.
IOVS 2006;47:4942-4946.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Need for Innovation in Glaucoma Surgery
Wilson
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:633-633.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.