You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 3, March 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (48)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Articles for Residents
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


A Randomized Trial of Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia in Children

The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:268-278.

Objective  To compare patching and atropine as treatments for moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years.

Methods  In a randomized clinical trial, 419 children younger than 7 years with amblyopia and visual acuity in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 were assigned to receive either patching or atropine at 47 clinical sites.

Main Outcome Measure  Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye and sound eye after 6 months.

Results  Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye improved in both groups (improvement from baseline to 6 months was 3.16 lines in the patching group and 2.84 lines in the atropine group). Improvement was initially faster in the patching group, but after 6 months, the difference in visual acuity between treatment groups was small and clinically inconsequential (mean difference at 6 months, 0.034 logMAR units; 95% confidence interval, 0.005-0.064 logMAR units). The 6-month acuity was 20/30 or better in the amblyopic eye and/or improved from baseline by 3 or more lines in 79% of the patching group and 74% of the atropine group. Both treatments were well tolerated, although atropine had a slightly higher degree of acceptability on a parental questionnaire. More patients in the atropine group than in the patching group had reduced acuity in the sound eye at 6 months, but this did not persist with further follow-up.

Conclusion  Atropine and patching produce improvement of similar magnitude, and both are appropriate modalities for the initial treatment of moderate amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7 years.


From the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Fla.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Amblyopia in Children
Burton J. Kushner
JAMA. 2002;287(16):2145-2146.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Clinical Profile of Moderate Amblyopia in Children Younger Than 7 Years
The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):281-287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atropine vs Patching for the Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia in Children
Burton J. Kushner
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):387-388.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):411-412.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Response to Editorial About the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial
Cotter et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1229-1230.
FULL TEXT  

Provision and cost of children's and young people's eye services in the UK: findings from a single primary care trust
Alexander et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:645-649.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atropine Penalization for "Rescuing" Patching Failures
Simon and Baxi
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:220-221.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacological Plus Optical Penalization Treatment for Amblyopia: Results of a Randomized Trial
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:22-30.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patching vs Atropine to Treat Amblyopia in Children Aged 7 to 12 Years: A Randomized Trial
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1634-1642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial of Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia: Follow-up at Age 10 Years
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1039-1044.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sutured Protective Occluder for Severe Amblyopia
Arnold et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:891-895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Much Amblyopia Treatment Is Enough?
Repka
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:990-991.
FULL TEXT  

Modeling Dose-Response in Amblyopia: Toward a Child-Specific Treatment Plan
Stewart et al.
IOVS 2007;48:2589-2594.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stability of Visual Acuity Improvement Following Discontinuation of Amblyopia Treatment in Children Aged 7 to 12 Years
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:655-659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Strabismus
Donahue
NEJM 2007;356:1040-1047.
FULL TEXT  

Progression of Intermittent, Small-Angle, and Variable Esotropia in Infancy
Fu et al.
IOVS 2007;48:661-664.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anisometropic Amblyopia: The Potential Role of Keratorefractive Surgery
Paysse
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:25-29.
ABSTRACT  

The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Repka
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:41-47.
ABSTRACT  

Evidence-Based Amblyopia Treatment: Results of PEDIG Studies
Wallace
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:48-55.
ABSTRACT  

PEDIG Results in Perspective: Concerns
Kutschke
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:56-59.
ABSTRACT  

Current Recommendations for Amblyopia Treatment
Arnoldi
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:60-67.
ABSTRACT  

Refractive Surgery in Children: Is It Ready for Prime Time?
Paysse
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:79-88.
ABSTRACT  

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Amblyopia Treatment Review
Rees et al.
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl. 2007;57:99-103.
ABSTRACT  

Predictors and a remedy for noncompliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the occlusion dose monitor.
Loudon et al.
IOVS 2006;47:4393-4400.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Causes and Associations of Amblyopia in a Population-Based Sample of 6-Year-Old Australian Children.
Robaei et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:878-884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concern About the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 2-Year Follow-up Study
Kushner
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1615-1616.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Unilateral Amblyopia: Factors Influencing Visual Outcome
Stewart et al.
IOVS 2005;46:3152-3160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of Treatment of Amblyopia in Children Aged 7 to 17 Years
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:437-447.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Amblyopia in Older Children
Hunter
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:557-558.
FULL TEXT  

Two-Year Follow-up of a 6-Month Randomized Trial of Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia in Children
The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:149-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Report May Be Too Optimistic About Efficacy of Treatment
Lempert
Pediatrics 2004;114:1366-1366.
FULL TEXT  

The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Report May Be Too Optimistic About Efficacy of Treatment: In Reply
Quinn et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1366-1367.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment Dose-Response in Amblyopia Therapy: The Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS)
Stewart et al.
IOVS 2004;45:3048-3054.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Amblyopia
Quinn et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:1800-1802.
FULL TEXT  

Screening for Visual Impairment in Children Younger Than Age 5 Years: Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:263-266.
FULL TEXT  

Cost effectiveness of treatment for amblyopia: an analysis based on a probabilistic Markov model
Konig and Barry
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:606-612.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effectiveness of Patching for Amblyopia Should Be Tested With Untreated Control Subjects
Lempert
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:423-424.
FULL TEXT  

The Effectiveness of Patching for Amblyopia Should Be Tested With Untreated Control Subjects--Reply
Repka et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:424-425.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Utility Analysis of Orthoptic Screening in Kindergarten: A Markov Model Based on Data From Germany
Konig and Barry
Pediatrics 2004;113:e95-108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visual Improvement in an Adult Amblyopic Eye Following Radiation-Induced Visual Loss in the Contralateral Eye
Karatza et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:126-128.
FULL TEXT  

Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening
Clarke et al.
BMJ 2003;327:1251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Patching and Atropine Treatment on the Child and Family in the Amblyopia Treatment Study
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1625-1632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Defining and measuring treatment outcome in unilateral amblyopia
Stewart et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1229-1231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial of Patching Regimens for Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia in Children
The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group*
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:603-611.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A randomised controlled trial of written information
Lempert
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87 :517-518.
FULL TEXT  

Amblyopia therapy
Fleck
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:255-256.
FULL TEXT  

A randomised controlled trial of written information
Lempert
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:124-124.
FULL TEXT  

Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Amblyopia in Children
Kushner
JAMA 2002;287:2145-2146.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia: Atropine Drops vs. Patching
JWatch Pediatrics 2002;2002:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Atropine vs Patching for the Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia in Children
Kushner
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:387-388.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.