This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Neurology  • Articles for Residents  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Allison M. McKendrick, PhD; George A. Cioffi, MD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:154-161.

Objective  To examine short-wavelength sensitivity in patients with migraine using short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) and Stiles 2-color increment threshold procedures.

Methods  Twenty-five subjects with migraine with (n = 11) and without (n = 14) aura and 20 age-matched headache-free subjects underwent testing. All subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and SWAP (using a Humphrey field analyzer; 24-2 presentation pattern). In 2 migraine patients (one with and another without aura), the 2-color increment threshold procedure was used to determine whether sensitivity losses were specific to short-wavelength sensitivity pathways or a generalized loss to multiple pathways.

Results  No statistically significant differences between migraine patients and controls were found for mean deviation (MD) or pattern-standard deviation (PSD) for SAP. However, for SWAP, MD and PSD were worse for the migraine group (P = .04). Twelve migraine patients had more than 4 locations with sensitivity worse than the 5% probability level (reference value). Increment threshold determinations in the 2 selected migraine patients indicated a selectively greater loss for short-wavelength sensitivity mechanisms.

Conclusions  Approximately 50% of subjects with migraine (with or without aura) demonstrate SWAP sensitivity losses, at times between migraine events. These findings, in conjunction with previous results for SAP and flicker perimetry, suggest that migraine patients should be excluded from normative databases of visual function, and warrant further investigations of the relationship between migraine and glaucoma.

From the Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Clinical Research and Technology Center, Portland, Ore.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Ophthalmology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(2):243.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Orientation Discrimination and Contrast Detection Thresholds in Migraine for Cardinal and Oblique Angles
Tibber et al.
IOVS 2006;47:5599-5604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transient Tritanopia in Migraine: Evidence for a Large-Field Retinal Abnormality in Blue-Yellow Opponent Pathways
Tibber and Shepherd
IOVS 2006;47:5125-5131.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decreased Visual Field Sensitivity Measured 1 Day, Then 1 Week, after Migraine
McKendrick and Badcock
IOVS 2004;45:1061-1070.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contrast-Processing Dysfunction in both Magnocellular and Parvocellular Pathways in Migraineurs with or without Aura
McKendrick and Badcock
IOVS 2003;44:442-448.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT